Bibliometric analysis of regional Latin America's scientific output in Public Health through SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Abstract

BackgroundIn the greater framework of the essential functions of Public Health, our focus is on a systematic, objective, external evaluation of Latin American scientific output, to compare its publications in the area of Public Health with those of other major geographic zones. We aim to describe the regional distribution of output in Public Health, and the level of visibility and specialization, for Latin America; it can then be characterized and compared in the international context.MethodsThe primary source of information was the Scopus database, using the category “Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health”, in the period 1996–2011. Data were obtained through the portal of SCImago Journal and Country Rank. Using a set of qualitative (citation-based), quantitative (document recount) and collaborative (authors from more than one country) indicators, we derived complementary data. The methodology serves as an analytical tool for researchers and scientific policy-makers.ResultsThe contribution of Latin America to the arsenal of world science lies more or less midway on the international scale in terms of its output and visibility. Revealed as its greatest strengths are the high level of specialization in Public Health and the sustained growth of output. The main limitations identified were a relative decrease in collaboration and low visibility.ConclusionsCollaboration is a key factor behind the development of scientific activity in Latin America. Although this finding can be useful for formulating research policy in Latin American countries, it also underlines the need for further research into patterns of scientific communication in this region, to arrive at more specific recommendations.

Virology research in a Latin American developing country: a bibliometric analysis of virology in Colombia (2000–2013)

“…In the case of Colombian productivity in research on HPV, although most of the published papers came from HIV studies, the highest median SJR of the publications came from HPV research ( Table 4), indicating that the classical view of the number of papers is not the only important factor in categorizing research. This could be useful in establishing points of reference and facilitating decision making regarding research policies related to virology studies and also animal, human, and plant health, as has been proposed by others [38].…”

Public, environmental, and occupational health research activity in Arab countries: bibliometric, citation, and collaboration analysis

“…Bibliometric studies are important because they can be used to obtain data and draw a picture about the state of research in any particular field in any particular country. Several international bibliometric studies in the field of public, environmental and occupational health have been published but none was published from Arab countries [67][68][69]. Therefore, this study was conducted to analyze the quantity and quality of research published in "Public, Environmental & Occupational Health" category in Arab countries.…”

Journals removed from DOAJ appearing within SCImago's ranks: A study of excluded journals

“…Its journals are generally considered to be ‘the core of international scientific knowledge’ (Delgado‐López‐Cózar & Cabezas‐Clavijo, , p. 102; see also Gómez‐Núñez, Vargas‐Quesada, de Moya‐Anegón, & Glänzel, ). Numerous studies have used SCImago as a dependable bibliometric tool to assess the quality of scholarly publications (e.g., Cantín, Muñoz, & Roa, ; Jamali, Salehi‐Marzijarani, & Ayatollahi, ; Khurshid, ; Kianifar, Sadeghi, & Zarifmahmoudi, ; Ramin & Shirazi, ; Siebelt et al, ; Spiroski, ; Zacca‐González, Chinchilla‐Rodríguez, Vargas‐Quesada, & de Moya‐Anegón, ).…”