2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12911-017-0476-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bibliometric analysis of worldwide scientific literature in mobile - health: 2006–2016

Abstract: BackgroundThe advancement of mobile technology had positively influenced healthcare services. An emerging subfield of mobile technology is mobile health (m-Health) in which mobile applications are used for health purposes. The aim of this study was to analyze and assess literature published in the field of m-Health.MethodsSciVerse Scopus was used to retrieve literature in m-Health. The study period was set from 2006 to 2016. ArcGIS 10.1 was used to present geographical distribution of publications while VOSvie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
178
1
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
178
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to other studies [19,33,[35][36][37], some limitations of this bibliometric study should be addressed. Although Scopus is one of the most largest global database [84], it might contain most publications in the field of leishmaniasis research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to other studies [19,33,[35][36][37], some limitations of this bibliometric study should be addressed. Although Scopus is one of the most largest global database [84], it might contain most publications in the field of leishmaniasis research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…All documents referring to leishmaniasis research during the last two decades were assessed with the following aspects: document types, languages, yearly publications, countries and collaboration patterns, institutions, journals, h-index, citations, and research hotspots. The analysis focused on providing outputs for the top ten prolific of the following: countries, journals with their impact factors (IF), cited articles, and institutions as in the most previous bibliometric studies [19,33,[35][36][37]. In the current study, IF for the most prolific journals were extracted according to the 2017 journal citation report (JCR) at the time of study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Portugal, which was the third most productive country, did not have any institution situated among the most productive ones, so it can be suspected that the Portuguese research production in this topic was highly distributed among different institutions. In addition, no American institutions were found among the leading contributors, which was not a typical situation, as institutions from USA are frequently among the most productive ones in most research areas [31,80,81]. …”
Section: Publication Distribution Of Countries and Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11th Neufeld et al [66] "Reduced anxiety-like behavior and central neurochemical change in germ-free mice" [95], toxicology [28], social media in psychology [96], parasitic diseases [51,97], and viral diseases [98][99][100]. Additionally, it also reveals that researchers paid great attention on the MGBA mostly in recent years, and published several outstanding articles on top-ranking journals in the medical field such as Science [56] and Nature [64].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%