Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of the Scientific Literature on Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (PENS) for Pain Treatment

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) is a minimally invasive peripheral neuromodulation approach implemented against chronic neuropathic and mixed pain. This bibliometric study aims to quantitatively evaluate the output of PENS for pain treatment in the scientific literature. The main purpose is to stimulate research in the field and bridge potential scientific gaps. Methods: Articles were retrieved from the Web of Science (WOS) database. The search key term was “percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (All Fields) and pain (All Fields)”. Year of publication, journal metrics (impact factor and quartile, Q), title, document type, topic, and citations were extracted. The join-point regression was implemented to assess differences in time points for the publication output. The software tool VOSviewer (version 1.6.17) was used for the visual analysis. Results: One thousand three hundred and eighteen articles were included in the knowledge visualization process. A linear upward trend for annual new publications was found. Almost two-thirds of the documents were published in top-ranked journals (Q1 and Q2). The topic “efficacy” was prevalent (12.81%). Concerning article type, the search strategy yielded 307 clinical investigations (23.3%). Articles were cited 36,610 times with a mean of 42.4 citations per article. Approximately one-half of the articles were cited less than 23 times in a range of 21 years. The semantic network analysis for keywords found eight clusters. The analysis of collaborative efforts among researchers showed five thematic clusters including 102 authors with a minimum of five documents produced in collaborations. Most partnerships involved the United States, England, and Germany. Conclusions: despite the upward trend in the number of publications on the subject and the publication of articles in top-ranked journals, there is a need to increase scientific collaborations between researchers and institutions from different countries.

The Twenty-Five Most Cited Articles About Adductor Canal Block: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1980 to 2022

“…The most important gap to be addressed is the standardization of methods and the definition of protocols, this gap is shown in other analgesic technique areas. 45 In other words, the lack of uniform application criteria can limit the judgment on the effectiveness of the technique. Although adductor canal block is a simple intervention, practitioners must customize their treatment strategy based on several variables.…”

Bibliometric Analysis on the Distributed Decision, Decentralized Decision, and Fuzzy Logic

“…Today, many databases can be used to obtain data and to conduct bibliographic or bibliometric research. WoS covers many journals in the feld of science and is widely used in bibliometric studies because it provides great convenience for researchers to analyze [4][5][6].…”

“…Tus, the importance of the decisionmaking mechanism in diferent problems that await solutions in many diferent areas of life increases. Supply chain and energy have complex and dynamic decision-making processes [4,5], including management, scheduling, energy systems, optimization, network management, control systems, and many others. Terefore, decentralized decision making and distributed decision making are the particular ways of accomplishing in this feld.…”

Bridging knowledge gaps: a bibliometric analysis of non-invasive ventilation in palliative care studies

“…The methodology aligns with established practices in bibliometric investigations. In these analyses, a single database is implemented to maintain consistency and precision in the results, avoiding data overlap from different sources [ 19 – 22 ]. A comprehensive examination of global literature concerning NIV in palliative care was conducted using the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) online database.…”