Bibliometrics, Citation Anatysis and Co-Citation Analysis: A Review of Literature II

Osareh, Farideh

doi:10.1515/libr.1996.46.4.217

Cited by 44 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The patterns can than be used to map out in great detail the relationship between those key ideas [29]. Osareh (1996) concludes that "in a specific field and period of time the most cited papers are the most useful or important papers, and also the most co-cited papers are the most related papers" [32]. Cawkell and Newton (1967) point out that by using co-citation as a part of the automatic clustering procedure, it is assumed that frequently cited papers are more important than less cited papers and that frequently co-cited papers are significant and related in subject to each other [33].…”

Section: Approaches To Citation Network Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Modelling decisions on energy-efficient renovations: A review

Friege

Chappin

2014

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Approaches To Citation Network Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Modelling decisions on energy-efficient renovations: A review

Friege

Chappin

2014

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Co-citations can map the structure of human factors research and show distinct areas of research and communities of practice. It can also identify the core papers of these areas and the evolution of scientific ideas that underlie these areas (Osareh, 1996).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric Analysis of Human Factors (1970-2000): A Quantitative Description of Scientific Impact

2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bibliometric analyses use the citation history of scientific articles as data to measure scientific impact. This paper describes a bibliometric analysis of the 1682 papers and 2413 authors published in Human Factors from 1970 to 2000. The results show that Human Factors has substantial relative scientific influence, as measured by impact, immediacy, and half-life, exceeding the influence of comparable journals. Like other scientific disciplines, human factors research is a highly stratified activity. Most authors have published only one paper, and many papers are cited infrequently, if ever. A small number of authors account for a disproportionately large number of the papers published and citations received. However, the degree of stratification is not as extreme as in many other disciplines, possibly reflecting the diversity of the human factors discipline. A consistent trend of more authors per paper parallels a similar trend in other fields and may reflect the increasingly interdisciplinary nature of human factors research and a trend toward addressing human-technology interaction in more complex systems. Ten of the most influential papers from each of the last 3 decades illustrate trends in human factors research. Actual or potential applications of this research include considerations for the publication and distribution policy of Human Factors.

show abstract

“…1). Both are well-established bibliometric methods for analyzing the structures of scientific disciplines (Osareh 1996a(Osareh , 1996b. Citation analyses investigate the relationships between citing and cited publications.…”

Section: Methods and Data Setmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring CMOT’s intellectual structure and its development

Meyer

Zaggl

Carley

2010

Comput Math Organ Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Computational Organization Theory is often described as a multidisciplinary and fast-moving field which can make it difficult to keep track of it. The recent inclusion of Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory (CMOT) into the Social Science Citation Index offers a good reason to take stock of what has happened since the foundation of the journal and to analyze its intellectual structure and development from 1995 to 2008. We identify the most influential publications by means of citation analysis and show that a core of codified knowledge has developed over time. Additionally, we provide empirical support for the characteristics generally ascribed to the journal such as multidisciplinarity. Finally, we depict the main research foci in CMOT's intellectual structure employing a co-citation analysis of publications and investigate their development over time. Overall, our quantitative review shows CMOT to be thematically focused on organizations, groups and networks while being remarkably diverse in terms of theoretical approaches and methods used.

show abstract

Bibliometrics, Citation Anatysis and Co-Citation Analysis: A Review of Literature II

Cited by 44 publications

References 16 publications

Modelling decisions on energy-efficient renovations: A review

Modelling decisions on energy-efficient renovations: A review

Bibliometric Analysis of Human Factors (1970-2000): A Quantitative Description of Scientific Impact

Measuring CMOT’s intellectual structure and its development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About