2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-005-0210-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bibliometrics of a controversial scientific literature: Polywater research, 1962-1974

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, RCTs are found in publications concentrating on cardiovascular disease, cancer, asthma, postoperative Scientometrics 75 (2008) condition, health, and anesthetics. Focusing on books, journal publications, conference proceedings and technical reports, ACKERMANN [2005] examined the bibliometrics of the controversial scientific literature of polywater, a new kind of water, research. The data were collected from the beginning in 1962 with the first publication of the discovery of polywater and ending in 1974 with the last polywater papers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, RCTs are found in publications concentrating on cardiovascular disease, cancer, asthma, postoperative Scientometrics 75 (2008) condition, health, and anesthetics. Focusing on books, journal publications, conference proceedings and technical reports, ACKERMANN [2005] examined the bibliometrics of the controversial scientific literature of polywater, a new kind of water, research. The data were collected from the beginning in 1962 with the first publication of the discovery of polywater and ending in 1974 with the last polywater papers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kannan & Thanuskodi, 2019). Ackermann (2005) defined bibliometrics as the quantitative analysis of scientific texts (documents) based on publication and citation data. Bibliometrics depicts the scientific communications among authors, institutions and countries (Özkose & Gencer, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%