2021
DOI: 10.1142/s1793005721500381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bicategory-Theoretic Approach to Minimal Fuzzy Realization for Fuzzy Behavior

Abstract: This work applies the bicategory-theoretic concepts in formation of minimal fuzzy realization for a given fuzzy behavior. The concept of derivative of fuzzy behavior is used for such construction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other directions of future scope of study done in this paper are to study minimal realization of fuzzy multiset finite automata, where membership structure of fuzzy sets may be algebraic structures different from [0, 1] and distributive lattices keeping in the mind the fact that the nature of input sets (crisp set [19,20], fuzzy sets [101], multisets [47,51]) and structure of membership values ([0,1][20], poset, distributive lattice [102], residuated lattice [103,104], LSET [47]) of fuzzy automata play a very important role in characterization of various concepts in different versions of fuzzy automata, i.e., the properties of fuzzy automata which hold with one membership structure of fuzzy sets may not hold with other membership structures of fuzzy sets, e.g., categorical characterizations of concepts associated with fuzzy multiset finite automata studied in sections 5 and onwards of [47] do not simply holds if we change membership structure of fuzzy sets from LSET to any one of the structures [0, 1], arbitrary sets, posets, distributive lattice or complete residuated lattices because of role of functor U defined in proposition 10 of [47]. The relationship of categorical concepts with automata theory (cf., [62,[105][106][107][108][109][110]) and partial order sets [105]) are well known, such study may be carried out in case of FMFA and posets/lattice structures associated with FMFA introduced in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other directions of future scope of study done in this paper are to study minimal realization of fuzzy multiset finite automata, where membership structure of fuzzy sets may be algebraic structures different from [0, 1] and distributive lattices keeping in the mind the fact that the nature of input sets (crisp set [19,20], fuzzy sets [101], multisets [47,51]) and structure of membership values ([0,1][20], poset, distributive lattice [102], residuated lattice [103,104], LSET [47]) of fuzzy automata play a very important role in characterization of various concepts in different versions of fuzzy automata, i.e., the properties of fuzzy automata which hold with one membership structure of fuzzy sets may not hold with other membership structures of fuzzy sets, e.g., categorical characterizations of concepts associated with fuzzy multiset finite automata studied in sections 5 and onwards of [47] do not simply holds if we change membership structure of fuzzy sets from LSET to any one of the structures [0, 1], arbitrary sets, posets, distributive lattice or complete residuated lattices because of role of functor U defined in proposition 10 of [47]. The relationship of categorical concepts with automata theory (cf., [62,[105][106][107][108][109][110]) and partial order sets [105]) are well known, such study may be carried out in case of FMFA and posets/lattice structures associated with FMFA introduced in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algebraic aspects of fuzzy automata and languages have been studied in [32,51]. The minimal realization problem of fuzzy languages has been studied algebraically in [21], by category-theoretic approach in [50,53,55], and in bicategory theoretic setting in [52,54,63] to brings closer the gap between classical automata theory and natural languages. The fuzzy automata and languages have been shown helpful in many applications like supervisory control [43], learning systems [60], heart problem deduction [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%