2008
DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biclustering of Gene Expression Data by an Extension of Mixtures of Factor Analyzers

Abstract: A challenge in microarray data analysis concerns discovering local structures composed by sets of genes that show homogeneous expression patterns across subsets of conditions. We present an extension of the mixture of factor analyzers model (MFA) allowing for simultaneous clustering of genes and conditions. The proposed model is rather flexible since it models the density of high-dimensional data assuming a mixture of Gaussian distributions with a particular omponent-specific covariance structure. Specifically… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our modelling framework is based on the biclustering approach proposed by Martella et al (2008), where the idea is to approximate the data density by a mixture of Gaussian distributions with an appropriate component-specific covariance structure. More precisely, we consider a partition of indicators by imposing a binary and row stochastic matrix representing column partition, whereas the traditional mixture approach is used to defined university clustering.…”
Section: Model-based Biclusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our modelling framework is based on the biclustering approach proposed by Martella et al (2008), where the idea is to approximate the data density by a mixture of Gaussian distributions with an appropriate component-specific covariance structure. More precisely, we consider a partition of indicators by imposing a binary and row stochastic matrix representing column partition, whereas the traditional mixture approach is used to defined university clustering.…”
Section: Model-based Biclusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 2, we describe the data, introduce the indicators and provide summary (descriptive) statistics. The model-based biclustering used for the analysis has been proposed by Martella et al (2008) and described in Section 3, along with computational details needed to obtain parameter estimates. Results are discussed in Section 4, whereas Section 5 provides conclusions and future development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical joint clustering methods were based on a distance (Hartigan, 1972). The modern methods can be divided into two subcategories: (i) the frequentist approach where the statistical parameters of the model are treated as fixed unknowns, for example mixture models (Lazzeroni and Owen, 2002); and (ii) the Bayesian approach where a prior distribution is associated to the model parameters (Gu and Liu, 2008;Martella et al, 2008;Zhang, 2010), for a comprehensive review see Madeira and Oliveira (2004), Tanay et al (2005), and Busygin et al (2008). In modern joint clustering, observations in each joint cluster are supposed to be drawn independently of a parametric form (Sheng et al, 2003;Gan et al, 2008;van Uitert et al, 2008;Martella et al, 2008;Hochreiter et al, 2010).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical joint clustering methods were based on a distance (Hartigan, ). The modern methods can be divided into two subcategories: (i) the frequentist approach where the statistical parameters of the model are treated as fixed unknowns, for example mixture models (Lazzeroni and Owen, ); and (ii) the Bayesian approach where a prior distribution is associated to the model parameters (Gu and Liu, ; Martella et al., ; Zhang, ), for a comprehensive review see Madeira and Oliveira (), Tanay et al. (), and Busygin et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation