2020
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2020.2969278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bicoherence Interpretation in EEG Requires Signal to Noise Ratio Quantification: An Application to Sensorimotor Rhythms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated Bicoherence value reduces to 0.28 at SNR = -15dB and eventually diminishes to almost zero at SNR of -20dB. The results are similar to [39] where a different phase coupling model was used to report that Bicoherence fails to reliably detect phase coupling when SNR is less than -16 dB (or S/N = 0.158). As per their analysis [39, Fig.…”
Section: Fig 14 Experimental Setup To Study the Effect Of Vibration O...supporting
confidence: 74%
“…The estimated Bicoherence value reduces to 0.28 at SNR = -15dB and eventually diminishes to almost zero at SNR of -20dB. The results are similar to [39] where a different phase coupling model was used to report that Bicoherence fails to reliably detect phase coupling when SNR is less than -16 dB (or S/N = 0.158). As per their analysis [39, Fig.…”
Section: Fig 14 Experimental Setup To Study the Effect Of Vibration O...supporting
confidence: 74%
“…A significant QPC enhancement (R BQPC ) with noise in brain circuits might offer a mechanism for higher-order coding bridging temporal and frequency coding schemes [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90]. A recent paper has emphasized QPC between the sensorimotor mu and beta components of EEG during the different phases of a motor task, even when mu and beta oscillations have a low SNR [91]. In addition, we suggest that the interpretation of QPC stochastic resonance should also be considered in the framework of deterministic chaotic dynamics with reentry circuits characterized by distinct frequencies of brain oscillations [92] [93].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high-pass filter was applied at 0.1 Hz for the purpose of DC offset correction, while a notch filter was used at 60 Hz to eliminate the electrical interference. The raw signal was bandpass filtered between 7 and 32 Hz to exclude all of the frequency components other than mu and beta, as the studies [ 43 , 44 , 45 ] revealed the occurrence of MI patterns in the stated frequency range. However, the artifacts were removed using the EEGLAB-based artifact removal algorithm called artifact subspace reconstruction (ASR).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%