2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-022-05030-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BICOSS: Bayesian iterative conditional stochastic search for GWAS

Abstract: Background Single marker analysis (SMA) with linear mixed models for genome wide association studies has uncovered the contribution of genetic variants to many observed phenotypes. However, SMA has weak false discovery control. In addition, when a few variants have large effect sizes, SMA has low statistical power to detect small and medium effect sizes, leading to low recall of true causal single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Results We present… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified 65 SNPs highly correlated to changes in RFW Supplementary Material Figure S5 ). In order to narrow the list of candidate SNPs to a more focused set of SNPs, the data were also analyzed using the two-stages procedure implemented in the R package GWAS.BAYES [ 38 , 39 ]. This analysis reduced the number of SNPs highly associated with ∆RFW to 11 ( Table 2 ); however, no SNPs were highly associated with ∆PRL in this analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We identified 65 SNPs highly correlated to changes in RFW Supplementary Material Figure S5 ). In order to narrow the list of candidate SNPs to a more focused set of SNPs, the data were also analyzed using the two-stages procedure implemented in the R package GWAS.BAYES [ 38 , 39 ]. This analysis reduced the number of SNPs highly associated with ∆RFW to 11 ( Table 2 ); however, no SNPs were highly associated with ∆PRL in this analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetic algorithm in the model selection step forces the SNPs to compete to appear in the highest ranked models. As shown in [ 39 ], combining a screening step and a model selection step provides a much shorter list of significant SNPs and leads to a much higher true discovery rate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we focus on GLMMs where each random effect has a covariance matrix that is the product of an unknown variance component parameter and a known positive semi‐definite symmetric matrix. The class of GLMMs we consider can be used for the analysis of spatial areal data (Banerjee et al., 2014; Clayton and Kaldor, 1987), genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) (Williams et al., 2022), and longitudinal data (Breslow and Clayton, 1993; Xu et al., 2016). However, inference for GLMMs is difficult because the integrated likelihood function is not available in closed form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To resolve the multiple testing issue, many statistical methods have been developed in terms of penalization [4][5][6][7], Bayesian variable selection [8,9], and sure independence screening strategy [10][11][12]. Researchers proposed variable selection methods by incorporating the group information to select genetic variants in both gene and SNP levels simultaneously [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%