2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00013-019-01328-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bicrossed products with the Taft algebra

Abstract: Let G be a group which admits a generating set consisting of finite order elements. We prove that any Hopf algebra which factorizes through the Taft algebra and the group Hopf algebra K[G] (equivalently, any bicrossed product between the aforementioned Hopf algebras) is isomorphic to a smash product between the same two Hopf algebras. The classification of these smash products is shown to be strongly linked to the problem of describing the group automorphisms of G. As an application, we completely describe by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the same strategy relying on matched pairs and bicrossed products was used to approach the factorization problem for various mathematical objects such as: (co)algebras [11,12,13], Lie algebras and Lie groups [21,24], Leibniz algebras [6], Hopf algebras [25], fusion categories [15] and so on. Furthermore, this new approach has also the advantage of opening the way to new classification methods as evidenced in [2,3,8,19] for Hopf algebras. Since their introduction by P. Jordan in 1933, Jordan algebras have appeared in various different fields of mathematics and mathematical physics such us the theory of superstrings, supersymmetry, projective geometry, Lie algebras and algebraic groups, representation theory or functional analysis [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the same strategy relying on matched pairs and bicrossed products was used to approach the factorization problem for various mathematical objects such as: (co)algebras [11,12,13], Lie algebras and Lie groups [21,24], Leibniz algebras [6], Hopf algebras [25], fusion categories [15] and so on. Furthermore, this new approach has also the advantage of opening the way to new classification methods as evidenced in [2,3,8,19] for Hopf algebras. Since their introduction by P. Jordan in 1933, Jordan algebras have appeared in various different fields of mathematics and mathematical physics such us the theory of superstrings, supersymmetry, projective geometry, Lie algebras and algebraic groups, representation theory or functional analysis [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%