Abstract:The authors conducted a 22-year (1988-2009) content analysis of quantitative empirical research that included acculturation and/or enculturation as a study variable(s). A total of 138 studies in 134 articles were systematically evaluated from 5 major American Psychological Association and American Counseling Association journals in counseling and counseling psychology, including Journal of Counseling Psychology, The Counseling Psychologist, Journal of Counseling and Development, Journal of NOT THE PUBLISHED VERSION; this is the author's final, peer-reviewed manuscript. The published version may be accessed by following the link in the citation at the bottom of the page. Psychology, Vol. 58, No. 1 (January 2011): pg. 83-96. DOI. This article is © American Psychological Association and permission has been granted for this version to appear in e-Publications@Marquette. American Psychological Association does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from American Psychological Association.
Journal of Counseling
2Multicultural Counseling and Development, and Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology. To guide the analysis, the authors conceptualized acculturation/enculturation as a "bilinear" (i.e., developing cultural orientations to both majority and ethnic cultures) and "multidimensional" (i.e., across multiple areas such as behaviors, values, identity, and knowledge) cultural socialization process that occurs in interaction with "social contexts" (e.g., home, school, work, West Coast, Midwest). Findings include the patterns and trends of acculturation/enculturation research in (a) conceptualization and use of acculturation/enculturation variable(s), (b) research designs (e.g., sample characteristics, instruments, data collection, and analysis methods), (c) content areas, and (d) changes in total publications and trends over time. Additionally, meta-analyses were conducted on the relationship of acculturation/enculturation and a few key variables of mental health, adjustment, and well-being. Major findings and directions for future research are discussed.Since the 1980s, interests in acculturation research have increased in the counseling and counseling psychology field, reflecting the emergence of multicultural movement in the field and the influx of immigrants to the United States after the enactment of the Immigration Reform Act in 1965. Starting in the 1980s, Berry and his colleagues developed a landmark acculturation theory that many counseling and counseling psychology researchers have used as a framework to conceptualize and study acculturation experiences (see Berry, 1980Berry, , 1994Berry, , 1995Berry, , 1997 Berry & Sam, 1996). For example, the terminology used in Berry's typology of acculturation strategies (i.e., assimilation, separation, integration, and marginalization) has become a common language in the acculturation literature (for a critical review of the typology, see Rudmin, 2003;Schwartz, Unger,...