2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bicycle seat interface pressure: reliability, validity, and influence of hand position and workload

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
59
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
59
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results for absolute values of seat pressure are similar to those reported by Bressel and Cronin [7] who studied the effects of handlebar position and workload on seat pressure, as well as Schrader et al [14] who evaluated bicycle saddle pressure in police patrols. The static evaluations of saddle pressure does not influence trunk position or saddle design for women, while for men the saddle pressure was different between the trunk positions mainly when the holed saddle was evaluated.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results for absolute values of seat pressure are similar to those reported by Bressel and Cronin [7] who studied the effects of handlebar position and workload on seat pressure, as well as Schrader et al [14] who evaluated bicycle saddle pressure in police patrols. The static evaluations of saddle pressure does not influence trunk position or saddle design for women, while for men the saddle pressure was different between the trunk positions mainly when the holed saddle was evaluated.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Lower magnitudes of seat pressure were observed for saddle with gel. The trunk positioned more forwards and inclined was also related to a lower seat pressure as previously proposed [7] .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In many prior studies, pelvic motion either has not been directly measured (2,10,18,20) or the pelvis has been assumed to be stationary on the saddle (5,15,20,21). Others have used a single marker located over the greater trochanter to estimate hip motion (7,22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%