2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bidirectional interference between timing and concurrent memory processing in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

10
40
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
10
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As explained in the ''Introduction'', a concurrent task interferes with one or other of them if it relies on the same memory component. Our demonstration of selective interference between the articulatory suppression task and the recognition of auditory durations confirms-and consolidates through the use of a new paradigm-the hypothesis that the maintenance of auditory temporal information in short-term working memory involves the phonological loop (Franssen et al, 2006;Rattat, 2010;Wearden & Culpin, 1995, 1998. It is worth recalling that in the previous studies examining the role of the phonological loop in time estimation, researchers used a dualtask procedure in which participants simultaneously performed a temporal and a nontemporal task, such that the latter may well have disturbed both the registration of duration and its maintenance in short-term working memory.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As explained in the ''Introduction'', a concurrent task interferes with one or other of them if it relies on the same memory component. Our demonstration of selective interference between the articulatory suppression task and the recognition of auditory durations confirms-and consolidates through the use of a new paradigm-the hypothesis that the maintenance of auditory temporal information in short-term working memory involves the phonological loop (Franssen et al, 2006;Rattat, 2010;Wearden & Culpin, 1995, 1998. It is worth recalling that in the previous studies examining the role of the phonological loop in time estimation, researchers used a dualtask procedure in which participants simultaneously performed a temporal and a nontemporal task, such that the latter may well have disturbed both the registration of duration and its maintenance in short-term working memory.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Franssen and colleagues, therefore, suggested that ''time estimation is mediated by phonological working memory and the involvement of an active verbal rehearsal process'' (p. 304). Similar conclusions regarding the involvement of the phonological loop in the short-term retention of auditory durations have also been drawn by other authors (Rattat, 2010;Wearden & Culpin, 1995, 1998.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although it is now commonly agreed that there is no such single, dedicated locus in the human brain, it is assumed that some sort of general-purpose, cognitively controlled internal clock mechanism is available for keeping track of time (Allman et al, 2014). This timekeeper hypothesis is supported by research showing that an additional cognitive task interferes with the production of regularly timed intervals (Brown, 1997;Fortin & Breton, 1995;Krampe, Doumas, Lavrysen, & Rapp, 2010;Ogden, Salominaite, Jones, Fisk, & Montgomery, 2011;Rattat, 2010). However, because the computational and cognitive resources of humans are limited, and temporal production often occurs in situations of cognitive load, the timekeeper hypothesis is presumably inadequate to fully explain timing behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this account cannot be applied to our present situation, as the interference is given after and not during the online encoding phase, it may suggest that both procedures unravel competing processes in shared neural networks. Interestingly, the analyses of bidirectional interference effects on the temporal and non-temporal performance in dualtask situations suggested that the interference effect on time judgment was more important for the visuo-spatial than for the auditory information (e.g., Brown, 2006;Rattat, 2010). It would thus be important to examine in future studies the variation of interference effects on the dynamic of memory consolidation processes for duration as a function of the type of interference task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as mentioned above, Rattat and Droit-Volet (2010) showed that it was possible to disrupt the memory for duration with a non-temporal interference task (a parlor game), that was a cognitive load task which required both to maintain information in shortterm memory and to manipulate verbal information in working memory. Indeed, some studies have demonstrated with the dual-task paradigm, when the participants simultaneously performed a temporal task and a competing non-temporal task, that the duration processing requires the central executive system of the working memory (e.g., Brown, , 2006Champagne & Fortin, 2008;Fortin, Rousseau, Bourque, & Kirouac, 1993;Rattat, 2010). In…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%