Bidirectional priming in infants

Barr, Rachel; Vieira, Aurora; Rovee‐Collier, Carolyn

doi:10.3758/bf03195285

Cited by 28 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although our current understanding of memory reactivation in human infants is based largely on operant conditioning procedures, a growing body of research, including the data reported here, has shown that the phenomenon of memory reactivation can be examined with other memory paradigms commonly used with infants (Bahrick et al, 1997;Barr, Marrott, & RoveeCollier, 2003;Barr, Vieira, & Rovee-Collier, 2002;Cornell, 1979;Hayne, Barr, & Herbert, 2003;Hudson & Sheffield, 1998. Thus, despite the common claim that operant conditioning procedures and VRM procedures measure different kinds of memory in human infants, many of the findings obtained using these two different procedures are remarkably similar (Hayne, 2004).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Age‐related changes in memory reactivation by 1‐ and 2‐year‐old human infants

Morgan

Hayne

2005

Developmental Psychobiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In three experiments, we examined the effect of a single reactivation treatment on retention by 1- and 2-year-old human infants who were tested in the visual recognition memory (VRM) paradigm. In all experiments, infants were familiarized with a visual stimulus and were tested after a delay. In the absence of a reactivation treatment, infants of both ages exhibited forgetting but exposure to a reactivation treatment alleviated forgetting after the same delay. When the duration of the original familiarization period was only 10 s, the minimum duration of an effective reminder treatment was 1 s for 2-year-olds, but was 5 s for 1-year-olds. When the duration of the original familiarization period was increased to 30 s, however, a 1-s reminder also alleviated forgetting by 1-year-olds.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Age‐related changes in memory reactivation by 1‐ and 2‐year‐old human infants

Morgan

Hayne

2005

Developmental Psychobiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since that initial report, other imitation studies using the same task and parameters with 6-month-olds have appeared Barr, Marrott, & Rovee-Collier, 2003;Barr et al, 2001Barr et al, , 2002Cuevas, Learmonth, & Rovee-Collier, 2003;Learmonth, Lamberth, & Rovee-Collier, 2003). Recently, we found that even 3-month-olds who watched the target actions modeled six times on the puppet could successfully imitate them 3 months later, at 6 months of age, if their memory of the demonstration was periodically reactivated until they Wnally became motorically competent to imitate (Campanella & Rovee-Collier, 2004).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Generalization of deferred imitation during the first year of life

Learmonth

Lamberth

Rovee‐Collier

2004

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Self Cite

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Recent research has shown that, under some conditions, infants as young as 6 months of age will exhibit deferred imitation of behavior modeled live (Barr et al, 1996(Barr et al, , 2005Barr & Hayne, 1999;Barr, Vieira, & Rovee-Collier, 2002;Barr, Vieria, & RoveeCollier, 2001;Collie & Hayne, 1999;Hayne, Boniface, & Barr, 2000;Hayne, MacDonald, & Barr, 1997). The earliest age at which infants will imitate similar behaviors seen on television is not known.…”

Section: Exp 1c: Can 12-month-olds Imitate From Television?mentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of repetition on imitation from television during infancy

Barr

Muentener

Garcia

et al. 2007

Developmental Psychobiology

Self Cite

146

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although television exposure levels during infancy are high, the impact of such exposure on learning is relatively unknown. Initial studies have shown that infants imitate significantly fewer target actions from a televised demonstration than they imitate from a live demonstration. It was hypothesized that increasing the duration of exposure to the videotaped demonstration would increase learning from television. Independent groups of 12- to 21-month-olds were exposed to live or videotaped demonstrations of target actions, and imitation of the target actions was measured 24 hr later. The video segment duration was twice that of the live presentation. Doubling exposure increased levels of imitation performance in the video groups to that of the live groups, and both groups exceeded baseline performance. These results are consistent with the perceptual encoding impoverishment theory, and we conclude that repeated exposure enhances encoding of the target actions from a 2D television source.

show abstract

Bidirectional priming in infants

Cited by 28 publications

References 38 publications

Age‐related changes in memory reactivation by 1‐ and 2‐year‐old human infants

Age‐related changes in memory reactivation by 1‐ and 2‐year‐old human infants

Generalization of deferred imitation during the first year of life

The effect of repetition on imitation from television during infancy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About