2005
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2005.50.2.0698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bidirectional reflectance function for oceanic waters with varying chlorophyll concentrations: Measurements versus predictions

Abstract: The bidirectional reflectance of the ocean is an important parameter in ocean color remote sensing. Model predictions for case-1 waters were compared with measurements over a large range of chlorophyll concentrations (0.1-10 mg m Ϫ3 Chl, where Chl represents the sum of chlorophyll a and phaeophytin a), but with restricted solar zenith angles. We used the measured chlorophyll concentration and a model to predict the shape of the upwelling spectral radiance distribution. We found that the model predicted the rad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we did not have [Chl] values approaching 10 mg m −3 , thus did not see the Table 1. RMS difference between Q n (sr) model (Morel et al, 2002) (Voss and Morel, 2005). Zibordi and Berthon (2001) have described an additional model for Q nadir based on data obtained in the Adriatic Sea, however this water type was significantly different than our data base, hence did not agree very well with our data and is not shown.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we did not have [Chl] values approaching 10 mg m −3 , thus did not see the Table 1. RMS difference between Q n (sr) model (Morel et al, 2002) (Voss and Morel, 2005). Zibordi and Berthon (2001) have described an additional model for Q nadir based on data obtained in the Adriatic Sea, however this water type was significantly different than our data base, hence did not agree very well with our data and is not shown.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…In the past we have had two investigations looking at the accuracy of the series of Q values as predicted by models (Morel et al, 1995;Voss and Morel, 2005). Each of these was done with a different version of our radiance distribution camera systems (RADS: Voss, 1989; RADS-II, Voss and Chapin, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The light distribution in aquatic environments has been well studied in the past [16,17]; however, to give the reader a better understanding of the consequences of this study, the hemispherical reflectance distributions for a few solar zenith angles (θ s ) are shown in Fig. 3.…”
Section: B Forward Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These calculations assume the transmission of light along a vertical path through the ocean and the ocean surface, providing the spectral radiance for a nadir-viewing instrument immediately above the ocean surface. In practice, these calculations are complicated by the angular dependence of the upwelling radiance [10,11], the angular dependence of the water-leaving radiance, and the Fresnel transmittance. For MOBY measurements, the propagation of light to the surface is made from the topmost arm of the buoy (z 1 =1 m).…”
Section: The Measurement Equation [7]mentioning
confidence: 99%