1985
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1985.0033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bifid mandibular canals in panoramic radiographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
194
3
23

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
9
194
3
23
Order By: Relevance
“…They can be grouped into different classifications, as proposed by various authors [8][9] . Chávez-Lomeli et al 10 questioned the definition of the term "bifid" assigned to the mandibular canal with variation in number, claiming there is no such division of the mandibular canal into two or more canals, but the persistence or non-fusion of embryologically defined branches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be grouped into different classifications, as proposed by various authors [8][9] . Chávez-Lomeli et al 10 questioned the definition of the term "bifid" assigned to the mandibular canal with variation in number, claiming there is no such division of the mandibular canal into two or more canals, but the persistence or non-fusion of embryologically defined branches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this area, a RMC may be present and emerge through the retromolar foramen 4,5 . The RMC presents morphological and morphometric variability 6 , including a posterior concavity 7 as well as straight RMC 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various classifications for bifid mandibular canals proposed by different authors such as Langlais et al, [5] Nortjé et al, [8] and Naitoh et al [14] In the present study, Langlais et al, classification was utilized to designate the type of bifid mandibular canal since it was the most cited classification system in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Initially, published studies by Lara et al, [1] Langlais et al, [5] Nortjé et al, [8] Sanchis et al, [9] and Singh et al [10] using panoramic radiograph on bifid mandibular canal reported the prevalence of 5%, 1%, 1%, 0.35%, and 4.3%, respectively. Recent studies employed CBCT images where Rashsuren et al, [11] Yang et al, [12] and Orhan et al [13] found the prevalence as high as 22.6%, 31.1%, and 46.5%, respectively, compared to the prevalence of 5.63% found in the present study using CBCT images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation