Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Three strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and three bifidobacteria (Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, Bifidobacterium breve, and Bifidobacterium subtile) were used as target strains; in addition, for each microorganism, the cell-free supernatant (CFS) was produced and used as an ingredient of the growth medium. Namely CFSs from lactobacilli were used on bifidobacteria and CFSs from bifidobacteria were used on lactobacilli. The viable count was assessed, and the data were modelled through a reparametrized Gompertz equation cast both in the positive and negative form to evaluate the parameters t-7log, which is the time after which the viable count was 7 log CFU/mL, and the t-7log*, which is the time after which the viable count was below 7 log CFU/mL; the difference between the t-7log* and t-7log defines the stability time. Statistics through a multiparametric ANOVA (analysis of variance) provided evidence for the presence of a bifidogenic and/or bioactive factor produced by bifidobacteria and active on lactobacilli, and vice versa (bioactive factor of lactobacilli with a functional effect on bifidobacteria), although further studies are required to better explain the mechanisms beyond the positive effects. In addition, the influence on the target strains can be found during the growth phase (stimulation), as well as during senescence and death phase (protective effect), with a strong strain/species dependence on both CFS production and target strain.
Three strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and three bifidobacteria (Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, Bifidobacterium breve, and Bifidobacterium subtile) were used as target strains; in addition, for each microorganism, the cell-free supernatant (CFS) was produced and used as an ingredient of the growth medium. Namely CFSs from lactobacilli were used on bifidobacteria and CFSs from bifidobacteria were used on lactobacilli. The viable count was assessed, and the data were modelled through a reparametrized Gompertz equation cast both in the positive and negative form to evaluate the parameters t-7log, which is the time after which the viable count was 7 log CFU/mL, and the t-7log*, which is the time after which the viable count was below 7 log CFU/mL; the difference between the t-7log* and t-7log defines the stability time. Statistics through a multiparametric ANOVA (analysis of variance) provided evidence for the presence of a bifidogenic and/or bioactive factor produced by bifidobacteria and active on lactobacilli, and vice versa (bioactive factor of lactobacilli with a functional effect on bifidobacteria), although further studies are required to better explain the mechanisms beyond the positive effects. In addition, the influence on the target strains can be found during the growth phase (stimulation), as well as during senescence and death phase (protective effect), with a strong strain/species dependence on both CFS production and target strain.
The hectic pace of modern life often leads to quick solutions, both in lifestyle and the choice of food we consume. The importance of the gut microbiome and its balance is being increasingly researched, with the prebiotic concept itself becoming a topic of scientific investigation. The aim of this paper is to analyze scientific studies on the understanding of prebiotics conducted between 2019 and 2024 in order to see what new knowledge, new sources, new ways of use, and newly established effects on certain disease states have been discovered during this period. The question that the authors are trying to answer is how specific prebiotics affect the growth and activity of selected probiotic strains in the human gut (have impact on gut microbiome) and what the implications of these interactions are. Four databases were searched: Pubmed/MEDLINE, Springerlink, Google Scholar, and Scopus. The keywords used were prebiotics, functional food, probiotics, gut microbiome, and trends. A systematic review of 30 scientific studies on the topic of prebiotics revealed significant advances in understanding and application. Research particularly indicates how prebiotics stimulate the growth of beneficial probiotic strains, such as Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, and Bifidobacterium. In addition, innovative approaches in food production, including pasta rich in prebiotic fibers, chocolate with inulin and stevia, and the use of fruit by-products, show promising results in creating “healthier” food options. Although the papers had differing objectives and research methodologies, certain similarities were found. All papers emphasized the importance of using prebiotics, although it depended on the type they come from and their impact on the gut microbiome, i.e., the stimulation of probiotic action within the gut microbiome, which consequently has benefits on health. This review serves as a springboard for further research in this exciting field, with the ultimate goal of harnessing the power of prebiotics to improve health outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.