2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2012.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bifix codes and Sturmian words

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
117
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, assume |w | 1 − |w| 1 even and let u = w ⊕ w . According to (2), |u| 1 is also even, moreover according to (1) we obtain w = σ |u| 1 (w): this implies w ∈ σ * 2 (w). According to Lemma 5.5, we have w ∈ σ * k (w): this establishes (ii).…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Conversely, assume |w | 1 − |w| 1 even and let u = w ⊕ w . According to (2), |u| 1 is also even, moreover according to (1) we obtain w = σ |u| 1 (w): this implies w ∈ σ * 2 (w). According to Lemma 5.5, we have w ∈ σ * k (w): this establishes (ii).…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…We show that the 2-block extension X (2) of X is eventually dendric with threshold 1. Set A 2 = {u, v, w} with f : aa → u, ab → v, ba → w. Since X is dendric, the graph E 1 (w) is a tree for every word w ∈ L(X (2) ) of length at least 1 (but not for w = ε). Thus X (2) is eventually dendric.…”
Section: Conjugacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a suffix code) U ⊂ L(X) is called X-maximal if it is not properly contained in a prefix code (resp. suffix code) Y ⊂ L(X) (see, for instance, [2]).…”
Section: Minimal Eventually Dendric Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , 10 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 1 3 2 2 3 1 1 1 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 1 1 1 3 3 2 2 3 3 1 1 1 0 4 0 2 …”
Section: Numerologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first part of the present article is motivated by the work [10]: a byproduct of the latter article is that the set of factors of given length n in a fixed Sturmian sequence (call such a set a factor set) is a basis of the subgroup of the free group F 2 which is the kernel of the homomorphism sending an element onto its algebraic length (that is, letters are sent onto 1 and their inverses onto −1) taken modulo n. Thus, the fact that a factor set is of cardinality n + 1, known since the work of Morse and Hedlund, appears as a very special case of the Schreier formula (which gives the rank of a subgroup of finite index of a free group). It was therefore tempting to give a more precise description of the factor sets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%