2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bifunctional composite separator with redistributor and anion absorber for dendrites-free and fast-charging lithium metal batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that the surface of lithium metal from the PP/LTO/PP separator is much smoother than that of lithium metal with the PP/PP separator, and no obvious lithium dendrites are observed on the lithium surface with the PP/LTO/PP separator, indicating that our LTO-modified separator can well inhibit the growth of lithium dendrites and stabilize the lithium surface. However, the mossy lithium dendrites are easily found on the lithium surface with the PP/PP separator, which is consistent with many reported results, which indicates our effective design of LTO-based separator. In addition, Figure S12 shows the first and second CV scans between 2.0 and 4.0 V. The oxidation peak near 3.6 V in the figure corresponds to the Li + extraction from the LFP cathode, and the reduction peak near 3.3 V corresponds to the Li + insertion into the LFP cathode.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It can be seen that the surface of lithium metal from the PP/LTO/PP separator is much smoother than that of lithium metal with the PP/PP separator, and no obvious lithium dendrites are observed on the lithium surface with the PP/LTO/PP separator, indicating that our LTO-modified separator can well inhibit the growth of lithium dendrites and stabilize the lithium surface. However, the mossy lithium dendrites are easily found on the lithium surface with the PP/PP separator, which is consistent with many reported results, which indicates our effective design of LTO-based separator. In addition, Figure S12 shows the first and second CV scans between 2.0 and 4.0 V. The oxidation peak near 3.6 V in the figure corresponds to the Li + extraction from the LFP cathode, and the reduction peak near 3.3 V corresponds to the Li + insertion into the LFP cathode.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Furthermore, the cycling stability of cell assembled with MS|PE|Ag 2 S separators is also superior to most previously reported metal batteries with other modified separators under lean electrolyte condition (Table S4, Supporting Information). [51][52][53][54][55][56][57] Besides, to demonstrate the possibilities for practical application, the MS|PE|Ag 2 S separator was further evaluated in a 414.2 Wh kg −1 Li |NCM811 pouch cell (3.2 Ah) under extremely lean electrolyte condition (2.3 g Ah −1 ). The pouch cell comprises a high-areal-capacity NCM811 cathode (4.6 mAh cm −2 ) and a thin Li-foil (50 µm thick/10.2 mAh cm −2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cathode was formed using the phase-inversion tape casting method described in detail in ref. 34–38. The as-formed disk-shaped green electrode with a diameter of 18 mm was pre-sintered at 1100 °C for 2 h. A thin YSZ electrolyte film was applied onto the pre-sintered electrode via dip-coating, followed by sintering at 1400 °C for 5 h. Then, a slurry of LSM–YSZ with a weight ratio of 50 : 50 was screen printed onto the YSZ electrolyte surface followed by calcination at 1180 °C for 2 h. An as-prepared cell was further treated by exposing its cathode to flowing H 2 (3 vol% H 2 O) at 800 °C for 5 h to facilitate the exsolution of NiFe nanoparticles from the LSCrFN phase.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%