1995
DOI: 10.1021/j100013a020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bifurcation Analysis of the Oregonator Model in the 3-D Space Bromate/Malonic Acid/Stoichiometric Coefficient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These simulations also revealed that the area of coexistence depends on the value of the parameter f. As seen in Figure 8.7, the coexistence area in the both responsive and nonresponsive heterogeneous 1D gels disappears as the stoichiometric parameter f is increased. The observed hysteretic effect takes place because the Oregonator model exhibits the subcritical Hopf bifurcation at the values of the stoichiometric parameter of f < 1 [39]. Figure 8.7 also shows that the responsive gels exhibit smaller hysteresis than the nonresponsive samples.…”
Section: Straining Heterogeneous Bz Gelsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These simulations also revealed that the area of coexistence depends on the value of the parameter f. As seen in Figure 8.7, the coexistence area in the both responsive and nonresponsive heterogeneous 1D gels disappears as the stoichiometric parameter f is increased. The observed hysteretic effect takes place because the Oregonator model exhibits the subcritical Hopf bifurcation at the values of the stoichiometric parameter of f < 1 [39]. Figure 8.7 also shows that the responsive gels exhibit smaller hysteresis than the nonresponsive samples.…”
Section: Straining Heterogeneous Bz Gelsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The rate equations are numerically solved using the calculated value of H = 0.9 M and f = 1.6 . The values of rate constants inherent to the traditional three variable Oregonator model are taken as k 1 = 2.0 H 2 M –1 s –1 , k 2 = 2.0 × 10 8 H M –1 s –1 , k 3 = 2.0 × 10 3 H M –1 s –1 , and k 4 = 4.0 × 10 8 M –1 s –1 . The rate constants for the steps R6 and R7 are taken as k 6 = 0.5 B M –1 s –1 , k 7 = 8.0 × 10 9 H M –1 s –1 , and k –7 = 2.0 × 10 –2 H M –1 s –1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 The rate equations are numerically solved using the calculated value 38 of H = 0.9 M and f = 1.6. 6 The values of rate constants inherent to the traditional three variable Oregonator model are taken as 39…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 NM is derived from OM following the same steps for the Oregonator system described in Ref. 52, based on the definitions of the scaled variables given in Table 3. The ODE system for NM is given in Table 2.…”
Section: Derivation Of Nm From Ommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details are given in Appendix D. Equations of the RM are listed inTable 2. In the derivation of RM from NM we follow the same steps as was done for the Oregonator model 52. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%