1980
DOI: 10.1090/s0273-0979-1980-14823-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bifurcation and symmetry breaking in applied mathematics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely, by inspecting the second γ-derivative of U s (γ) at γ = π/3 one finds that the universal equilibrium family s → γ * = π/3 yields a relative minimum of U s (γ) for s > −4 and a relative maximum for s < −4, while the second γ-derivative of U s (γ) at γ = π/3 vanishes at s = −4. Since (s, γ) → U s (γ) is real analytic about (s, γ) = (−4, π/3), analytical bifurcation theory [Sat80] reveals that at s = −4 two continuous families of non-universal equilibria branch off of the universal equilateral one. In a neighborhood of s = −4 it can be computed by setting s = −4 + 2σ, |σ| 1, and ξ 2 * (s) = 1 + η(σ), with 0 < |η(σ)| 1, and Taylor-expanding (19).…”
Section: Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, by inspecting the second γ-derivative of U s (γ) at γ = π/3 one finds that the universal equilibrium family s → γ * = π/3 yields a relative minimum of U s (γ) for s > −4 and a relative maximum for s < −4, while the second γ-derivative of U s (γ) at γ = π/3 vanishes at s = −4. Since (s, γ) → U s (γ) is real analytic about (s, γ) = (−4, π/3), analytical bifurcation theory [Sat80] reveals that at s = −4 two continuous families of non-universal equilibria branch off of the universal equilateral one. In a neighborhood of s = −4 it can be computed by setting s = −4 + 2σ, |σ| 1, and ξ 2 * (s) = 1 + η(σ), with 0 < |η(σ)| 1, and Taylor-expanding (19).…”
Section: Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle -and forgetting about the delays -the underlying analysis has been done by , who took advantage of Sattinger's (1979Sattinger's ( , 1980Sattinger's ( , 1983 beautiful work on bifurcation at an eigenvalue whose (infinite) degeneracy stems from a spatial symmetry group. The only proviso of their analysis is that, roughly, the inhibition has so long a range that the patterns turn out to be stationary parallel stripes; in more recent terminology (Murray 1989), they find Turing patterns.…”
Section: Symmetriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the theoretical side, there is an extensive literature on the analysis of bifurcation and symmetry breaking by using the group-representation theory, e.g. Sattinger (1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%