2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Big bedding planes: Outcrop size and spatial heterogeneity influence trace fossil analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…timeenvironment matrix) meaningful in the case of simple ichnofabrics more accurate characterization of composite ichnofabrics because the different indexes consider not only burrow density, but the amount of burrow overlap and the sharpness of the original fabric commonly used in conjunction with analysis of tiering structure, evaluation of taphonomic filters, ichnoguild characterization, and ichnofabric constituent diagrams all metrics proposed based on a measurement of the percentage area bioturbated, but bioturbation should be measured as a unit volume per unit time estimations may be problematic if colonization surface is not located [19][20][21] bedding-plane bioturbation index (BP-BI) visual estimation of density of trace fossils on these horizontal surfaces with the aid of flashcards particularly suitable for the analysis of shallow-tier to superficial trace fossils preserved along lithological interfaces (e.g. most Ediacaran-Fortunian) important to assess synecological aspects of benthic faunas useful synergies if combined with methods developed to evaluate the degree of patchiness in horizontal distribution of trace fossils in strict sense not a real metric of degree of bioturbation, which typically implies disruption of the sedimentary fabric [22][23][24] (Continued. )…”
Section: The Link Between Trace Fossils Behaviour and Ecosystem Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…timeenvironment matrix) meaningful in the case of simple ichnofabrics more accurate characterization of composite ichnofabrics because the different indexes consider not only burrow density, but the amount of burrow overlap and the sharpness of the original fabric commonly used in conjunction with analysis of tiering structure, evaluation of taphonomic filters, ichnoguild characterization, and ichnofabric constituent diagrams all metrics proposed based on a measurement of the percentage area bioturbated, but bioturbation should be measured as a unit volume per unit time estimations may be problematic if colonization surface is not located [19][20][21] bedding-plane bioturbation index (BP-BI) visual estimation of density of trace fossils on these horizontal surfaces with the aid of flashcards particularly suitable for the analysis of shallow-tier to superficial trace fossils preserved along lithological interfaces (e.g. most Ediacaran-Fortunian) important to assess synecological aspects of benthic faunas useful synergies if combined with methods developed to evaluate the degree of patchiness in horizontal distribution of trace fossils in strict sense not a real metric of degree of bioturbation, which typically implies disruption of the sedimentary fabric [22][23][24] (Continued. )…”
Section: The Link Between Trace Fossils Behaviour and Ecosystem Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These traits imply that, while the sedimentary environment in which the tidalite was deposited was clearly amenable to the tracemakers, burrowing was never pervasive everywhere. The vertical expression of intermittent burrowed laminae, colonized to their maximum possible extent, but separated by laminae that lack burrows, is explainable as a stratigraphic translation of an uneven spatial distribution of burrowed patches within the depositional environment (Miller & Smail, 1997; Dashtgard, 2011; Marenco & Hagadorn, 2019; Davies & Shillito, 2021). Supporting analogue comes from comparison with modern substrates dominantly colonized by vertically burrowing filter feeding organisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variability could feasibly bias ichnological analysis (e.g. Marenco & Hagadorn, 2019) the significance of surficial trace fossils such as trackways is clearly apparent in extensive bedding planes of the gorges, but more likely to be concealed where bedding plane exposures are limited. Figure 12 shows how the exposure of trace fossils would be expected to vary within the different types of exposure, in scenarios of either ubiquitous or scattered presence of trace fossils.…”
Section: B the Role Of Outcrop Geomorphology In Analysis Of The Tumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of bioturbation varies from occasional overlapping traces to total destruction of any primary bedding. The degree of bioturbation likely reflects a spatial patchiness to burrowing intensity (Marenco & Hagadorn, 2019). On areas of the bedding surfaces where the burrows are sparse, surface features remain intact and the traces are often seen in association with subaqueous and emergent sedimentary surface features including wave ripple marks and adhesion marks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%