2005
DOI: 10.1121/1.1985957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Big brown bats and June beetles: Multiple pursuit strategies in a seasonal acoustic predator–prey system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work showed that high-frequency firing of AN2, which occurs at the onset of an ultrasound stimulus, is required for behavioral responses (Nolen and Hoy, 1984). However, bat-insect encounters may last for several seconds, during which the insect is exposed to continuous, dynamic, stimulation with ultrasound (Simmons, 2005); thus, the need for AN2 to detect behaviorally relevant features of ultrasound stimuli and trigger avoidance responses persists at least for several seconds after the onset of a dynamic stimulus. The response of AN2 to long-lasting stimuli includes both isolated action potentials and bursts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work showed that high-frequency firing of AN2, which occurs at the onset of an ultrasound stimulus, is required for behavioral responses (Nolen and Hoy, 1984). However, bat-insect encounters may last for several seconds, during which the insect is exposed to continuous, dynamic, stimulation with ultrasound (Simmons, 2005); thus, the need for AN2 to detect behaviorally relevant features of ultrasound stimuli and trigger avoidance responses persists at least for several seconds after the onset of a dynamic stimulus. The response of AN2 to long-lasting stimuli includes both isolated action potentials and bursts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A Inset) (3,4). These bats change the interpulse intervals (IPIs), the initial high frequencies and terminating low frequencies of FM sweeps, the duration, and the amplitude of broadcasts according to surrounding conditions such as the distance to nearby objects (3)(4)(5)(6)(7). Each sonar broadcast impinges on objects at different distances to form a stream of echoes returning at different delays.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clutter interference is exacerbated by broadcast-echo ambiguity, creating a worst-case situation-self-generated clutter resulting from the use of too-short IPIs. The obvious effectiveness of echolocation in clutter (5,6,12,13) makes it desirable to learn how bats achieve this performance. When flying in dense clutter, big brown bats emit nearly all their sonar sounds in pairs, called "strobe groups," with shorter IPIs between members of the pairs set off by longer IPIs between one strobe group and the next (3,8,12,13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to distinguish between the completions of aerial interceptions of flying insects close to background objects from the capture of prey that rest or swarm on leaves or the ground ͑Schnitzler et al, 2003;see video clips in Simmons et al, 2001 andSimmons, 2005͒. In laboratory tests, free-flying insectivorous bats ͑five species of Myotis͒ were able to capture insects presented at varying distances ͑5-50 cm͒ from a clutter screen that was designed to mimic the edge of vegetation ͑Siemers and Schnitzler, 2004͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some kinds of insects taken as prey by big brown bats, such as crickets or katydids, are not commonly observed to fly at night and presumably must be taken from substrates such as the ground or vegetation ͑Fullard et al, 2005;Kurta and Baker, 1990͒. Beetles swarming in vegetation make buzzing sounds that are audible to bats ͑Hamr and Bailey, 1985͒, and crickets and katydids communicate with each other acoustically, in both cases providing bats with potential cues for passive hearing to detect and localize prey. However, when gleaning prey from clutter or substrates, the bat's actual approach and certain details of capture must be guided by some contribution from echolocation, if only to avoid collisions with vegetation or the substrate itself, and under these conditions the bats continue to emit echolocation sounds ͑Fullard et al., 2005;Ratcliffe et al, 2005;Schmidt, et al, 2000͒. The presence of targets on surfaces or in vegetation creates a complex acoustic scene with echoes from the target and from the clutter competing to be perceived ͑Moss and Surlykke, 2001;Ratcliffe and Dawson, 2003͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%