Big Data, social physics, and spatial analysis: The early years

Abstract

This paper examines one of the historical antecedents of Big Data, the social physics movement. Its origins are in the scientific revolution of the 17th century in Western Europe. But it is not named as such until the middle of the 19th century, and not formally institutionalized until another hundred years later when it is associated with work by George Zipf and John Stewart. Social physics is marked by the belief that large-scale statistical measurement of social variables reveals underlying relational patterns that can be explained by theories and laws found in natural science, and physics in particular. This larger epistemological position is known as monism, the idea that there is only one set of principles that applies to the explanation of both natural and social worlds. Social physics entered geography through the work of the mid-20th-century geographer William Warntz, who developed his own spatial version called ''macrogeography.'' It involved the computation of large data sets, made ever easier with the contemporaneous development of the computer, joined with the gravitational potential model. Our argument is that Warntz's concerns with numeracy, large data sets, machine-based computing power, relatively simple mathematical formulas drawn from natural science, and an isomorphism between natural and social worlds became grounds on which Big Data later staked its claim to knowledge; it is a past that has not yet passed.

Digital education governance: data visualization, predictive analytics, and ‘real-time’ policy instruments

“…Big data are also generated continuously and analysed in or near real time (often through automated analytics functions), meaning that data can provide not just static snapshots of discrete temporal events but dynamic and continuously updated forms of intelligence and insight. Of course, large-scale data archiving and statistical analysis have a very long history across governmental, commercial and academic sectors, for example, in national censuses, consumer loyalty schemes and the production of massive scientific knowledge databases; big data itself can be traced through the complex histories of computerization, military funding, commercialization, academic research agendas and changing forms of government regulation (Barnes and Wilson 2014). While largescale data archiving concentrates on the planned and sequenced collection of data at temporal intervals, the promise of big data is a massive acceleration in the velocity of data collection and analysis and a scaling-up in the volume of its accumulation.…”

Flashing lights in the quantified self-city-nation

“…(Massumi, 2009, p. 169) For many of these sorts of urban management systems, Massumi's realization is not particularly new (for instance, see multi-criteria decision-making and spatial decision support systems of a couple decades ago; Wilson, in press-b). Relatedly, it is not entirely clear what part of the 'new science of cities' (Batty, 2013) is all that novel: many of these pattern-seeking systems draw upon an analytics and epistemology long in the making (Barnes & Wilson, 2014). What does seem quite novel -and perhaps more significant given planetary economic crisis -is the amassing of capital by tech and consulting firms in the midst of crumbling urban and social infrastructure.…”

Data Derives: Confronting Digital Geographic Information as Spectacle

“…New data systems, especially those that link location and temporal information, have been investigated as 'fixes' for capitalism's tendencies towards overaccumulation (Greene and Joseph 2015), their historical entanglement in social physics and geodemographic profiling examined and their role and function as a commodity explored in detail (Barnes and Wilson 2014;Dalton and Thatcher 2015). While much (often digital) ink has been spilled regarding the fallacies and capitalist imperatives at the heart of new data accumulation and analysis regimes (not the least of which is our own), this recognition has done little to curb either the generation of said data or its valuation as a commodity.…”