2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2018.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Big data vs accurate data in health research: Large-scale physical activity monitoring, smartphones, wearable devices and risk of unconscious bias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Errors in detection of data are common owing to unconscious bias when developers apply a standard behavior to a heterogeneous population. As such, researchers have the responsibility to detect inconsistencies in health apps and wearables [24].…”
Section: Wearablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Errors in detection of data are common owing to unconscious bias when developers apply a standard behavior to a heterogeneous population. As such, researchers have the responsibility to detect inconsistencies in health apps and wearables [24].…”
Section: Wearablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unconscious biases reflect carelessness more so than malfeasance [9]. Unconscious bias in research [10] is present in all forms of data capture in a litany of different patient populations.…”
Section: Unconscious Biasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the same features reveal all of the information, how will the personal traits not impact the extracted activities? For example, in [134], the authors show how noisy data in big data smartphone health applications may lead to misleading conclusion. The authors studied the accuracy of a step count app in Apple and Android smartphones.…”
Section: Accuracy Of the Extracted Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [138], the authors conducted an experiment with the data harvested from more than 700k people from 111 countries to study countries' obesity situations. Other studies utilized 10-50 participants only [134,135].…”
Section: Accuracy Of the Extracted Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%