2017
DOI: 10.1111/puar.12866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Big Tigers, Big Data”: Learning Social Reactions to China's Anticorruption Campaign through Online Feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their study on rule abidance among Chinese frontline officers, Zang and Musheno () found that the majority were rule followers. Rule following ensures predictability and prevents abuses of power and corruption that can seriously hurt the government's legitimacy and threaten one‐party rule (Zhu, Huang, and Zhang ).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their study on rule abidance among Chinese frontline officers, Zang and Musheno () found that the majority were rule followers. Rule following ensures predictability and prevents abuses of power and corruption that can seriously hurt the government's legitimacy and threaten one‐party rule (Zhu, Huang, and Zhang ).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional anticorruption approaches, such as relying on campaign‐style dominated party organs (Fu, 2015; Lang, 2017) or legislative and judicial branches, which tackle some urgent issues, should be reconsidered. Given that these dominant anticorruption approaches lead to mixed results (Zhang & Kim, 2017; Zhu, Huang, & Zhang, 2019, on China; Paramahamsa, 2017; Wolf, 2017, on India) and can be politically controversial at times (Li, 2019; Mahmood, 2017), innovative approaches and policy mixes may well be alternatives worth considering to better signal commitment and improve the effectiveness of anticorruption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public anti-corruption campaigns seek to win public support as a source of political legitimacy (Zhu et al 2017) by signaling a zero-tolerance policy regarding non-ethical behavior in the civil service. We argue that these signals have changed the incentive structure for civil servants: Municipal offi cials who deviate from organizational norms, for reasons such as convenience, or favoring friends, may experience less valued rewards from public employment.…”
Section: Attitudes To Unethical Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%