2006
DOI: 10.1177/0363199006287785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bigamy in the Northern Alberta Judicial District, 1886–1969: A Socially Constructed Crime that Failed to Impose Gender Barriers

Abstract: Bigamy is still a criminal offense under the Canadian Criminal Code, one which is liable to up to five years imprisonment. Although modern social values and a certain relaxation of specific gender expectations make it easier for women to commit bigamy, in the popular imagination bigamy is a masculine crime. A close analysis of the Criminal Code and its application reflect differentiation of roles based on gender—that is, gender socialization. Yet evidence from the Edmonton judicial district between 1886 and 19… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Méthot, examining bigamy cases across nineteenth-and twentieth-century Alberta, argues that society viewed cases of male and female bigamy very differently, and this influenced the lower rate of prosecutions of women. 27 When men committed bigamy, they were deemed as having "ruined" their second wife by essentially obtaining sexual intercourse under false pretenses; some judges even likened the offense to rape, but where fraud not force was used. Given the sexual double standard, the same "harm" was not caused to men duped into bigamous marriages by women.…”
Section: Attitudes Towards Bigamymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Méthot, examining bigamy cases across nineteenth-and twentieth-century Alberta, argues that society viewed cases of male and female bigamy very differently, and this influenced the lower rate of prosecutions of women. 27 When men committed bigamy, they were deemed as having "ruined" their second wife by essentially obtaining sexual intercourse under false pretenses; some judges even likened the offense to rape, but where fraud not force was used. Given the sexual double standard, the same "harm" was not caused to men duped into bigamous marriages by women.…”
Section: Attitudes Towards Bigamymentioning
confidence: 99%