2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-004-0802-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bigger testes do work more: experimental evidence that testis size reflects testicular cell proliferation activity in the marine invertebrate, the free-living flatworm Macrostomum sp.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
82
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
82
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparative and experimental studies aimed at testing this prediction have generally used testis size as a measure of sperm production rate (see Schä rer et al 2004b for a list of parameters that have been used to estimate male allocation to sperm production). The choice of this parameter is largely guided by the relative ease with which it can be determined, but it has rarely been tested how testis size is related to sperm production rate; a linear relationship is usually just assumed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparative and experimental studies aimed at testing this prediction have generally used testis size as a measure of sperm production rate (see Schä rer et al 2004b for a list of parameters that have been used to estimate male allocation to sperm production). The choice of this parameter is largely guided by the relative ease with which it can be determined, but it has rarely been tested how testis size is related to sperm production rate; a linear relationship is usually just assumed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, testis size is a static measure, and therefore does not necessarily say much about the amount of resources that flow through it. We have previously discussed this issue (Schä rer et al 2004b) and we will therefore not further address it here. Second, testis size and sperm production rate may, at least to some degree, vary independently of each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, males that inseminate greater numbers of sperm achieve greater fertilization success (Martin et al 1974, Parker 1982. As the size of a males' testes predicts the proportion of the testes made up of sperm producing seminiferous tissue and the rate of sperm production (Willett & Ohms 1957, Parker 1982, Møller 1989, Marconato & Shapiro 1996, Scharer et al 2004, Lü pold et al 2009c, Ramm & Stockley 2010, Rowe & Pruett-Jones 2011, males with larger testes are expected to be competitively advantaged when engaging in sperm competition. Consequently, increases in the level of sperm competition are expected to select for increased investment in testicular tissue (Parker & Pizzari 2010).…”
Section: Sperm: Solders In the Battle For Fertilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testes mass is accepted as a good proxy for sperm competition risk (Parker et al 1997;Parker & Ball 2005). However, the dynamics of sperm production can vary (Møller 1991;Schärer & Vizoso 2007;Vahed & Parker 2012) and thus sperm production is challenging to assess, mainly because the production rate of sperm is often hard to quantify (Schärer et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%