2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2109.00911
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BiHPF: Bilateral High-Pass Filters for Robust Deepfake Detection

Abstract: The advancement in numerous generative models has a two-fold effect: a simple and easy generation of realistic synthesized images, but also an increased risk of malicious abuse of those images. Thus, it is important to develop a generalized detector for synthesized images of any GAN model or object category, including those unseen during the training phase. However, the conventional methods heavily depend on the training settings, which cause a dramatic decline in performance when tested with unknown domains. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, (Frank et al 2020) analyze the frequency artifacts using Discrete Cosine Transform, while (Zhang, Karaman, and Chang 2019) exploit the artifacts induced by the up-sampler of GANs. Others (Durall, Keuper, and Keuper 2020;Durall et al 2019) exploit the spectral distortions via azimuthal integration, while (Jeong et al 2021) adopt the bilateral high-pass filters for generalized detection. (He et al 2021) propose to re-synthesize testing images and extract visual cues for flexible detection.…”
Section: Frequency-based Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, (Frank et al 2020) analyze the frequency artifacts using Discrete Cosine Transform, while (Zhang, Karaman, and Chang 2019) exploit the artifacts induced by the up-sampler of GANs. Others (Durall, Keuper, and Keuper 2020;Durall et al 2019) exploit the spectral distortions via azimuthal integration, while (Jeong et al 2021) adopt the bilateral high-pass filters for generalized detection. (He et al 2021) propose to re-synthesize testing images and extract visual cues for flexible detection.…”
Section: Frequency-based Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed deepfake detector, we select the image-based(Wang et al 2020) and frequencybased state-of-the-art models(Frank et al 2020;Durall, Keuper, and Keuper 2020;Jeong et al 2021) for comparison.Deepfake Detection of Unknown Categories As shown in Figure4, we conduct various experiments using the three classifiers to analyze the performance of the models with 20 unknown categories. We compare our model's performance to the previous state-of-the-art models(Wang et al 2020;Durall, Keuper, and Keuper 2020;Frank et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, (Frank et al 2020) analyze the frequency artifacts using Discrete Cosine Transform, while (Zhang, Karaman, and Chang 2019) exploit the artifacts induced by the up-sampler of GANs. Others (Durall, Keuper, and Keuper 2020;Durall et al 2019) exploit the spectral distortions via azimuthal integration, while (Jeong et al 2021) adopt the bilateral high-pass filters for generalized detection. Recently, (He et al 2021) propose to resynthesize testing images and extract visual cues for flexible detection.…”
Section: Frequency-based Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ablation Test with Various Settings. select the image-based(Wang et al 2020) and frequencybased state-of-the-art models(Frank et al 2020;Durall, Keuper, and Keuper 2020;Jeong et al 2021) for comparison.Deepfake Detection of Unknown CategoriesAs shown in Figure4, we conduct various experiments using the three classifiers to analyze the performance of the models with 20 unknown categories. We compare our model's perfor-mance to the previous state-of-the-art models(Wang et al 2020;Durall, Keuper, and Keuper 2020;Frank et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%