2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcta.2003.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bijections for refined restricted permutations

Abstract: We present a bijection between 321-and 132-avoiding permutations that preserves the number of fixed points and the number of excedances. This gives a simple combinatorial proof of recent results of Robertson et al. (Ann. Combin. 6 (2003) 427), and Elizalde (Proc. FPSAC 2003). We also show that our bijection preserves additional statistics, which extends the previous results. r

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also appears in [21], as a bijection between 132-avoiding permutations and Dyck paths. Moreover, we would like to point out that a simple visualization of this bijection, which involves lattice paths connecting opposite corners of the permutation array, is given in [16,26]. Using such a description, some of the properties of the Bruhat order on noncrossing partitions, such as Theorem 4.2, can be suitably rephrased.…”
Section: Relationship With the Strong Bruhat Order On Permutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also appears in [21], as a bijection between 132-avoiding permutations and Dyck paths. Moreover, we would like to point out that a simple visualization of this bijection, which involves lattice paths connecting opposite corners of the permutation array, is given in [16,26]. Using such a description, some of the properties of the Bruhat order on noncrossing partitions, such as Theorem 4.2, can be suitably rephrased.…”
Section: Relationship With the Strong Bruhat Order On Permutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The longest increasing subsequence of a pattern-avoiding permutation was studied in [9] and the structure of the fixed points in pattern-avoiding permutations has been the subject many papers [12,10,11,13,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elizalde and Pak in [3] prove the corresponding result for their bijection Θ. We now establish the analogue of Theorem 3 for the map φ * studied in [1] and [2].…”
Section: Theorem 4 γ Maps the Set Of Involutions In S N (321) Onto Tmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Three decades later a refinement of this result was given by Robertson,Saracino,and Zeilberger [7], by taking into account the number of fixed points of σ . If S k n (α) denotes the set of σ ∈ S n (α) with exactly k fixed points, it was shown in [7] that |S k n (321)| = |S k n (132)| = |S k n (213)| and |S k n (231)| = |S k n (312)| for all 0 k n. The proofs in [7] were nonbijective, and Elizalde and Pak soon improved the result |S k n (321)| = |S k n (132)| by giving in [3] a bijection Θ : S n (321) → S n (132) that preserves not only the number of fixed points but also the number of excedances (i's such that σ i > i). The bijection Θ is obtained by combining two previously known bijections: a bijection of Knuth [4] between S n (321) and the set D n of Dyck paths of length 2n, and (in modified form) a bijection of Krattenthaler [5] between S n (132) and D n .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%