2015
DOI: 10.1002/jat.3173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bik subcellular localization in response to oxidative stress induced by chemotherapy, in Two different breast cancer cell lines and a Non‐tumorigenic epithelial cell line

Abstract: Cancer chemotherapy remains one of the preferred therapeutic modalities against malignancies despite its damaging side effects. An expected outcome while utilizing chemotherapy is apoptosis induction. This is mainly regulated by a group of proteins known as the Bcl-2 family, usually found within the endoplasmic reticulum or the mitochondria. Recently, these proteins have been located in other sites and non-canonic functions have been unraveled. Bik is a pro-apoptotic protein, which becomes deregulated in cance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is notable that the elevation of Bik was previously shown to correlate with oxidative stress 20,21. These results are consistent with and supportive of our main hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is notable that the elevation of Bik was previously shown to correlate with oxidative stress 20,21. These results are consistent with and supportive of our main hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Through changing its subcellular localization, BIK is involved in response to oxidative stress caused by chemotherapy in several breast cancer cell lines. 27 Moreover, BIK controls the expression of miRNAs as well as the autophagic flux in MDA-MB-231 cells. 28 Thus, it would be interesting to investigate whether Star-PAP is involved in these new functions of BIK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a recent study, a broad spectrum of mechanisms may be responsible for the resistance of MCF-10A cells to anticancer compounds. These include differences in the subcellular localization of Bik (Trejo-Vargas et al 2015) and the KLF8/EGFR signalling pathway (Li et al 2015), differences in stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 activity (Belkaid et al 2015) and combined inhibition by glycolysis and AMP-activated protein kinase (Wu et al 2015), and differences in mitochodrial-mediated apoptosis (Taha et al 2015). Therefore, the exact mechanism responsible for the selective activity of physodic acid in breast cancer should be further investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%