Bike-sharing as a possibility to support Vision Zero

Turoń, Katarzyna; Sierpiński, Grzegorz

doi:10.1051/matecconf/201823103005

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Growing accessibility of shared micromobility services is supporting municipal authorities in overcoming problems affecting urbanised areas. These problems are external transportation costs, traffic congestion, air pollution, space occupation (by cars) and car accidents [9][10][11][12]. Using shared e-scooters and e-bikes as a tool to achieve sustainable urban transportation requires making them available to as many social groups as possible.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electric Scooter Sharing and Bike Sharing User Behaviour and Characteristics

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

New, shared mobility modes, including dockless e-scooters and e-bikes, were recently introduced to many cities around the world. The aim of this article is to determine the differences between the users of e-bike sharing, and e-scooter sharing systems, and the characteristics of their travel behaviour. This study is based on the survey of the citizens of Tricity in northern Poland. We find that e-bicycles are predominantly used as first and last mile transport and to commute directly to various places of interest, whereas e-scooters are more often used for leisure rides. Survey respondents that adopted shared micromobility are generally young, and e-scooter users are on average younger than e-bike users. Although all shared vehicles in Tricity are electrically assisted, this did not allow for the elimination of the gender gap, or help retired and disabled people in the adoption of shared micromobility services. We have also identified factors discouraging people from the usage of e-bike and e-scooter sharing and found them to be different for both types of services. Finally, we investigated the issue of using shared e-bikes for urban logistics.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electric Scooter Sharing and Bike Sharing User Behaviour and Characteristics

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Works [63], [64] by Polish authors present results of the research on the issue of the success of the implementation of modern innovations in companies, represented collaborative mobility market (MaaS). Unfortunately, K. Turoń et al [64] concluded that «Research results show that open innovation is a problematic aspect for operators.…”

Section: Application Of the Theory To Russian Practice -Challenges An...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Experts on Resistance to Reorganization of Structure and Technologies of Urban Mobility Provision in Russia: Challenges, Reasons, Solutions and Prospects

Petrov

Zakharov²,

Petrova³

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 2022 a lot has changed in the Russian transport system. Today the urban transport systems of Russian cities are staying at the bifurcation point – they are awaiting serious changes. Therefore, it was interesting to investigate expert opinions of specialists on the prospects of the development of urban mobility provision technologies in Russia and possible changes in the current structure of citizens’ transportation approaches. The paper gives results of the research of opinions of transport market specialists on the issues of the probability of the shift of the current paradigm of transport services in Tyumen (a large Russian city with a population of 828.5 thousand people) and the necessity of reorganization of the structure and technologies of urban mobility provision due to the withdrawal of foreign automakers from the Russian market. The article presents the comparison of opinions between Tyumen professionals in the transport market and ordinary Russian citizens. The main conclusion of the research considers the serious resistance of the public environment to the expected reorganization of the structure and technologies of urban mobility provision in Russia.

show abstract

“…The Polish market is a very interesting area from the point of view of shared mobility services. Although vehicle sharing services appeared relatively late compared with other European countries, e.g., bike-sharing in 2008 [27][28][29], car-sharing in 2016 [30], moped-sharing in 2017 [30], and scooter-sharing in 2018 [30], this market is characterized as dynamic and valuable [31]. In 2020, the market value in Poland was USD 701 million, while the number of users of shared mobility systems was 9.1 million people [32].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Open Innovation—Opportunities or Nightmares for the Shared Transport Services Sector?

Turoń¹,

Kubik²

2022

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Shared transport services, including short-term vehicle rentals (bike-, car-, moped-, scooter-sharing) and travel sharing systems (ride-sharing, ride-hailing), have become more and more popular forms of mobility in recent years. Their increasing availability has made them an alternative to individual transport in cities. Along with the development of the systems, a growing number of operators offering sharing services started to appear. Many of them ended their activities after the pilot period or closed the company shortly after launching the system. There are many reasons for this, from management to technical issues, but the aspects of open innovation, open data and transparency were often overlooked. This begs the question whether it is the openness of systems that is the recipe for the market success or failure of shared mobility services. The aim of this work was to evaluate the approaches to data openness and innovation in companies representing the shared mobility market. A research proposal was submitted to diagnose the approach to open innovations in the market of shared mobility services. An expert survey was carried out among representatives of shared mobility services operating in major Polish cities. The expert survey was conducted using the CAWI technique. Research results show that open innovation is a problematic aspect for operators. On the one hand, they are interested in it, but this interest does not translate into real practices. Among the entire shared transport sector, the micro-mobility service providers are the most committed to open innovation. Research indicates that in order to increase the dynamics of the development of open innovation in the shared transport industry, there is a need for education in the field of open innovation, especially in the era of the development of digitization of urban transport systems and the pursuit of sustainable transport.

show abstract

Bike-sharing as a possibility to support Vision Zero

Cited by 7 publications

References 18 publications

Electric Scooter Sharing and Bike Sharing User Behaviour and Characteristics

Electric Scooter Sharing and Bike Sharing User Behaviour and Characteristics

Experts on Resistance to Reorganization of Structure and Technologies of Urban Mobility Provision in Russia: Challenges, Reasons, Solutions and Prospects

Open Innovation—Opportunities or Nightmares for the Shared Transport Services Sector?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About