2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.10.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral changes in somatosensory sensibility after unilateral below-knee amputation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
40
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus of the rehabilitation program was to increase the ability of the subjects to respond to large postural perturbations and perform the recovery steps necessary to avoid a fall. The training method used in this study allowed patients with amputations to learn how to perform a complex motor task in a safe environment and maintain gait stability despite the poor somatosensory feedback from their prosthesis and residual limb [9,16,20,22]. This type of training is not addressed in most rehabilitation programs and, to our knowledge, has not previously been used to retrain persons with lower limb amputation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of the rehabilitation program was to increase the ability of the subjects to respond to large postural perturbations and perform the recovery steps necessary to avoid a fall. The training method used in this study allowed patients with amputations to learn how to perform a complex motor task in a safe environment and maintain gait stability despite the poor somatosensory feedback from their prosthesis and residual limb [9,16,20,22]. This type of training is not addressed in most rehabilitation programs and, to our knowledge, has not previously been used to retrain persons with lower limb amputation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also report an increased fear of falling [5] and reduced social participation because of this fear [6]. In persons with a unilateral transtibial amputation due to trauma or vascular disease, poor sensation has been identified not only in the side of the amputation but also in the contralateral foot and knee [7]. This has been identified as another factor contributing to decreased balance and safety [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As prosthesis users have postural reorganization [20,35,55], which is likely to affect other muscles than those of the lower limb, future studies are warranted to see whether there are more proximal structures that are able to mediate postural responses in this population. As complex interactions between both limbs are responsible for coordinated response [48] and persons with unilateral amputation have contralateral sensory changes following their amputation [60], it is possible that the sensory structures of the intact limb had an effect on the results. By exploring the sensory structures of the remaining limbs in more detail with validated tools (e.g., monofilament testing), it might be possible to identify the interaction between sensory acuity and bilateral postural response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, regardless of position, the TTA group had increased latency in the intact limb. Bilateral sensory changes [14,60] and postural reorganization [55] previously shown in transtibial prosthesis users may be factors influencing this delayed EMG response in the intact limb. Given that the stretch reflex of the ankle can elicit an EMG response within 40 ms of perturbation, the results suggest there was no spinal reflex elicited for either of the groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%