2000
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/37/2/6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral comparisons of hydrometer calibrations between the IMGC-LNE and the IMGC-MIKES

Abstract: The Istituto di Metrologia "G. Colonnetti" (IMGC, Italy), the Laboratoire National d'Essais (LNE, France) and the Mittatekniikan Keskus (MIKES, Finland) support primary calibration facilities used both for liquid density measurements and for hydrometer calibrations. In 1998, two independent bilateral comparisons of the calibration of standard hydrometers were carried out between the IMGC and the LNE and between the IMGC and the MIKES, the main purpose being to assess the present state of mutual compatibility i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In metrology, it is mandatory to validate either a new measurement method or a modification with an already validated method [ 20 , 21 ]. In order to validate the methodology proposed in this work based on the aligning mark immersion hydrometer scale under calibration with the vision system and the algorithm of digital image processing [ 22 ], two international comparisons in the calibration immersion of hydrometers were carried out.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In metrology, it is mandatory to validate either a new measurement method or a modification with an already validated method [ 20 , 21 ]. In order to validate the methodology proposed in this work based on the aligning mark immersion hydrometer scale under calibration with the vision system and the algorithm of digital image processing [ 22 ], two international comparisons in the calibration immersion of hydrometers were carried out.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect should be considered especially if the hydrometer body is near the liquid surface. This is also the most probable explanation for the discrepancies observed in the results of the comparison between findings from MIKES and the Istituto di Metrologia 'G Colonnetti' (IMGC) in 1998-1999 [5] because the measurements at were carried out in a jacketed glass tube with a slightly raised liquid level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We studied the effect induced by a vertical temperature gradient experimentally. Measurements were carried out using the MIKES hydrometer calibration system [4,5] and a hydrometer with a scale covering the range 1.950-2.000 g cm −3 , i.e. 1950-2000 kg m −3 .…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In those situations where the range of the hydrometer to be calibrated is lower than the density of the reference liquid, additional weights are added to the hydrometer to cause it to sink. This is the most accurate method and it is in use at most NMIs (National Metrology Institutes), including the INRiM [18][19][20]. Full details of this method are given in the next section.…”
Section: Hydrostatic Weighingmentioning
confidence: 99%