2013
DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral hearing loss after dichloromethane poisoning: A case report

Abstract: Dichloromethane is a widely used organic solvent. Occupational exposure to dichloromethane is frequent and can result in both acute and chronic toxicity, affecting mostly the central nervous system, directly or through its metabolite, carbon monoxide. The effects of dichloromethane on the peripheral nervous system are debated. Here we report the case of a 37-year-old woman who was accidentally exposed to dichloromethane. In the days following the incident she experienced bilateral hypoacusis. Hearing loss regr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The duration of low back pain was longer in clinical and the duration of absenteeism was longer among office staff, yet these differences were not significant. These results were similar to previous studies (14)(15)(16).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The duration of low back pain was longer in clinical and the duration of absenteeism was longer among office staff, yet these differences were not significant. These results were similar to previous studies (14)(15)(16).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Pryor [44] categorised both agents as non-ototoxic. Note that there is a report of a woman who developed bilateral hearing loss after overexposure to dichloromethane [45]. Thus, we hypothesise that the auditory signs observed in styrene-exposed subjects may not be exclusive to styrene exposure.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Study And Suggestions For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Thirdly, the health effects of other chemical substances used in the laboratory where the patient worked, or potential secondary health effects generated while various chemicals were used in combination with organic solvents, were not evaluated. In addition, another drawback in this case report is that biological monitoring markers for dichloromethane such as blood levels of carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) or urinary dichloromethane [ 40 , 41 ] were not evaluated in the exposure assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%