2013
DOI: 10.1017/s0952523813000424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral lesions of nucleus subpretectalis/interstitio-pretecto-subpretectalis (SP/IPS) selectively impair figure–ground discrimination in pigeons

Abstract: Earlier, we reported that nucleus rotundus (Rt) together with its inhibitory complex, nucleus subpretectalis/interstitio-pretecto-subpretectalis (SP/IPS), had significantly higher activity in pigeons performing figure-ground discrimination than in the control group that did not perform any visual discriminations. In contrast, color discrimination produced significantly higher activity than control in the Rt but not in the SP/IPS. Finally, shape discrimination produced significantly lower activity than control … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most nAChR subunits were undetected in these regions. The nuclei subpretectalis (SP) and isthmi pars parvocellularis (IPc) play crucial roles in the regulation of visual figure‐ground discrimination (Schryver & Mysore, 2019; Scully et al., 2014). Here, ChrnB4 showed clear and specific expression in SP, while in contrast, IPc was labeled with high levels of ChrnA4, A5, and B3 expression (but ChrnA4 expression was suppressed in the lateral part of IPc; Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most nAChR subunits were undetected in these regions. The nuclei subpretectalis (SP) and isthmi pars parvocellularis (IPc) play crucial roles in the regulation of visual figure‐ground discrimination (Schryver & Mysore, 2019; Scully et al., 2014). Here, ChrnB4 showed clear and specific expression in SP, while in contrast, IPc was labeled with high levels of ChrnA4, A5, and B3 expression (but ChrnA4 expression was suppressed in the lateral part of IPc; Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on birds suggest they may attend to the figural region rather than use local properties when performing figure-ground segmentation. It was suggested that specific regions in the brain might be responsible for figure-ground segmentation (Scully et al 2014 ). Recent work on the barn owl tested its ability to detect a figure using the animal’s self-motion and found that information about self-motion can facilitate orientation-based figure-ground segmentation (Dutta et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on birds suggest they may attend to the figural region rather than use local properties when performing figure-ground segmentation. It was suggested that specific regions in the brain might be responsible for figure-ground segmentation (Scully et al 2014). A recent work on the barn owl tested its ability to detect a figure using the animal's self-motion and found that information about self-motion can facilitate orientation-based figure-ground segmentation (Dutta et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%