1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(98)00045-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral Q angle asymmetry and anterior knee pain syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
1
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
44
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…All measures were collected using previously established methods. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] For testing, participants were clothed in shorts that allowed exposure of all bony landmarks needed for testing and were barefoot. For all bony landmarks, the central point was palpated and marked with a fine-point marker.…”
Section: Lower Extremity Alignment Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All measures were collected using previously established methods. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] For testing, participants were clothed in shorts that allowed exposure of all bony landmarks needed for testing and were barefoot. For all bony landmarks, the central point was palpated and marked with a fine-point marker.…”
Section: Lower Extremity Alignment Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reportedly a significant difference in Q angle between sides has led to a statement that symmetry in right versus left lower limb Q angle measures may be erroneous. And this is why both knees of PFPS patients with bilateral knee pain were enrolled into the current study instead of one person one knee 7,22 Additionally, in our series, there was a significant difference in Q angle between sexes in our unopened observations (p< 0.01) This is why the male were excluded from the current study. As thus the current design merely focused on female population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…An increase in Q angle has long been looked as a pathologic factor in PFPS 4,5 . Presumably the larger the Q angle, the larger the lateral pulling force on the patella 2 , but reportedly Q angle rarely correlated with patellofemoral pain syndrome(PFPS) 6,7 . Livingston and Mandigo 7 reported that no correlations between the Q angle measures and the magnitude of discomfort experienced in unilateral knee pain sufferers; while these relationships were weak yet significant in bilateral knee pain sufferers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Manual measurements were performed with a standard goniometer compatible with the technique for Q angle assessment as shown in Figure 1. [10] BMI of every participant was calculated to determine obesity based on World Health Organization (WHO) obesity classification. BMI ranges were as follows -underweight: under 18.5 kg/m For the evaluation of pain, visual analog scale (VAS) was used compatible with the technique as described in the literature.…”
Section: Association Between Q Angle and Predisposition To Gonarthrosis*mentioning
confidence: 99%