1961
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1961.01300150062008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral Radical Dissection of the Neck

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

1962
1962
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only 15% showed no evidence of tumor recurrence. Similar results have been reported for several other series [13,14,[24][25][26]28,30,33,37,51]. We continue, however, to indicate surgery forced by the lack of treatment alternatives.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Only 15% showed no evidence of tumor recurrence. Similar results have been reported for several other series [13,14,[24][25][26]28,30,33,37,51]. We continue, however, to indicate surgery forced by the lack of treatment alternatives.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…No 5-year survival was observed in patients staged as N3 or Nx. Several investigators also observed an extremely poor prognosis for patients with more advanced lymph node dissemination [14,20,[58][59][60][61][62][63][64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But it is not infrequent to see such patients when thus treated to have progression of disease with fixity and subsequent ulceration of the neck masses with intolerable constant pain before succumbing to the disease. Radiation therapy given to such patients has very little to offer in terms of palliation or survival [1,7]. Thus, to prevent the usual consequences of the progression of already advanced disease, the tumor, if and when possible, may be removed by surgery with a hope to have a "local control" of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary indications are : 1) when metastatic lesions are present on both side of the neck; 2) as fundamental principle of oncology to avoid cutting through cancer tissue; and 3) any delay in carrying out surgery might permit the condition on either side to become inoperable. [18][19][20] As per one of the study, simultaneous bilateral neck dissection has an operative mortality of 10% with 11% life threatening complication and 62% significant facial swelling. There is an overall three-and five-year survival rate of 20% and 12.5 % respectively 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%