2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral similarity function: A novel and universal method for similarity analysis of biological sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, we found that the difference of ND5 protein between specie (9) and other species are greatest. In addition, the results obtained from numerical experiments are consistent with the fact of biological evolution [11,12], which also demonstrates the effectiveness of this method to some extent.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…On the other hand, we found that the difference of ND5 protein between specie (9) and other species are greatest. In addition, the results obtained from numerical experiments are consistent with the fact of biological evolution [11,12], which also demonstrates the effectiveness of this method to some extent.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…For comparison, we list the recently published results of the examination of the degree of similarity between Human and other several species in Fig. 8 (Zhang, 2009;Yu et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2010;Xie and Mo, 2011). As one can see there is an overall agreement among similarities obtained by different approaches despite some variation among them.…”
Section: Sequence Comparison With Polar Representationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Most of the existing methods for similarity identification are based on some kind of graphical representation (Randiü et al, 2003;Liao and Wang, 2004;Wang et al, 2010).…”
Section: Similarity Evaluation Derived From Cgrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also create the possibility of numerical characterization to obtain a quantitative measure of the degree of similarity/dissimilarity of different DNA/protein sequences (Deschavanne et al, 1999;Randiü et al, 2003;Liao and Wang, 2004;Wang et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%