2016
DOI: 10.1159/000452942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral Superior Cerebellar Artery Embolic Occlusion with a Fetal-Type Posterior Cerebral Artery Providing Collateral Circulation

Abstract: Bilateral infarction of the superior cerebellar arteries with sparing of the rest of the posterior circulation, particularly the posterior cerebral arteries, is an uncommon finding in neurological practice. Most commonly, the deficits of the superior cerebellar arteries and posterior cerebral arteries occur together due to the close proximity of their origins at the top of the basilar artery. A patient was transferred to the neurological intensive care unit with a history of recent-onset falls from standing, p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neurosurgeons have to avoid occluding an FPCA while treating ICA-PComA aneurysms, to avoid ischemic events in the PCA territory [ 16 ]. An FPCA could provide collateral circulation to the posterior brain after an embolus had occluded the top of the BA [ 19 ]. Ischemic events, however, also depend on the collateral anastomoses of the leptomeningeal vessels, allowing, or not, a vertebrobasilar supply of the ICA territory and vice versa [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurosurgeons have to avoid occluding an FPCA while treating ICA-PComA aneurysms, to avoid ischemic events in the PCA territory [ 16 ]. An FPCA could provide collateral circulation to the posterior brain after an embolus had occluded the top of the BA [ 19 ]. Ischemic events, however, also depend on the collateral anastomoses of the leptomeningeal vessels, allowing, or not, a vertebrobasilar supply of the ICA territory and vice versa [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%