2016
DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2016.12.1.65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilaterally Abnormal Head Impulse Tests Indicate a Large Cerebellopontine Angle Tumor

Abstract: Background and PurposeTumors involving the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) pose a diagnostic challenge due to their diverse manifestations. Head impulse tests (HITs) have been used to evaluate vestibular function, but few studies have explored the head impulse gain of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) in patients with a vestibular schwannoma. This study tested whether the head impulse gain of the VOR is an indicator of the size of a unilateral CPA tumor.MethodsTwenty-eight patients (21 women; age=64±12 years, mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 We defined the cutoff value for a caloric abnormality as more than 25% of caloric paresis according to Jongkee's formula, or less than 20°/s of the sum of four absolute slow-eye velocities obtained from both ears with bithermal irrigation. 14,15 An abnormal horizontal vHIT was defined as a gain less than 0.8 or more than 1.2 with corrective catch-up or back-up saccades. The vHIT gain was calculated as the ratio of the eye velocity relative to the head velocity during a 40-ms window centered at the peak head acceleration.…”
Section: Patients and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14 We defined the cutoff value for a caloric abnormality as more than 25% of caloric paresis according to Jongkee's formula, or less than 20°/s of the sum of four absolute slow-eye velocities obtained from both ears with bithermal irrigation. 14,15 An abnormal horizontal vHIT was defined as a gain less than 0.8 or more than 1.2 with corrective catch-up or back-up saccades. The vHIT gain was calculated as the ratio of the eye velocity relative to the head velocity during a 40-ms window centered at the peak head acceleration.…”
Section: Patients and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vHIT gain was calculated as the ratio of the eye velocity relative to the head velocity during a 40-ms window centered at the peak head acceleration. 14 In addition to the absolute vHIT gain, we also calculated the asymmetry index (AI) for the vHIT gain following a previously described method. 8 Other evaluations for audiovestibular functions included pure-tone audiometry, cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, subjective visual vertical, and the rotational chair test were performed on a selective basis.…”
Section: Patients and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Abnormal VOR gain was defined when the values were outside the mean 6 2 SDs obtained from the age-, sex-matched normal controls (< 0.70 or > 0.99 for the horizontal canals [HCs], < 0.70 or > 1.03 for the anterior canals [ACs], and < 0.74 or > 1.00 for the posterior canals [PCs]). 15…”
Section: Head-impulse Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). 66 In this instance, the ipsilesional caloric paresis and positive HITs to the lesion side are explained by the involvement of the vestibular nerve, whereas positive HITs to the contralesional side along with GEN is ascribed to floccular compression. 40 Metastasis to bilateral vestibular nerves is a rare cause of rapidly progressive BVD.…”
Section: Neoplastic Disordersmentioning
confidence: 80%