2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-97567-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bildungssysteme und soziale Ungleichheit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The related higher selectivity of schools offering medium and high curricula if they receive lower percentages of pupils due to the larger size of the vocational sector may avoid a watering down of the curriculum and a slackening of standards. We do not find a trade-off between socioeconomic inequality and high educational performance within highly stratified systems, in contrast to Von Below (2002).…”
Section: Educational Policy Can Make a Differencecontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The related higher selectivity of schools offering medium and high curricula if they receive lower percentages of pupils due to the larger size of the vocational sector may avoid a watering down of the curriculum and a slackening of standards. We do not find a trade-off between socioeconomic inequality and high educational performance within highly stratified systems, in contrast to Von Below (2002).…”
Section: Educational Policy Can Make a Differencecontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…One of the reasons for the ongoing stalemate in the German debates of educational policies is the assumed trade-off between socioeconomic inequality and high educational performance within highly stratified systems (Von Below, 2002). We do not find such a trade-off for the educational systems compared.…”
Section: Implications For the Explanation Of The Differences In Educamentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Hopper's efforts are also restricted to only a few nations but he already refers to the stratification of educational opportunities as the central dimension of a typology of education systems. One more recent classificatory attempt which remains within the borders of one country is Below's (2002) typology of state education systems that appears to have great empirical validity for Eastern German federal states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two states were obviously quite different in terms of their macroeconomic structure. Apart from some basic similarities, their education systems also differed in important aspects (see Below 2002). A rough but the only available proxy for identifying individuals who might have completed their education in the former German Democratic Republic is the information whether the respondent lived in the Eastern part of Germany at the time of the interview (1994).…”
Section: Educational Mobility Defined Methods Data and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies in this field are concerned with general schooling, focusing on how school structure shapes individual decision making. In particular, it is the early separation of children into different school forms that was identified as central to the evolution of inequalities in education and low intergenerational mobility (e.g., Bauer and Riphahn 2006;Boudon 1974;Breen and Goldthorpe 1997;Erikson and Jonsson 1996;von Below 2002;Pfeffer 2009;van de Werfhorst and Mijs 2010). Further studies indicate that educational institutions also affect individual labour market entry (Allmendinger 1989;Müller and Shavit 1998) and the assessment of an individual of his or her economic position (Groß 2003).…”
Section: Educational Institutions: State Of Research and Theoretical ...mentioning
confidence: 99%