2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2010.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biliary, Pancreatic, and Hepatic Imaging for the General Surgeon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 183 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The commonly used preoperative examinations of the liver include ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which provide important guidance for surgical preparation. In particular, contrast-enhanced CT and MRI can clearly show the vascular structure in the liver, including biliary strictures, biliary dilatation, and abnormal space-occupying lesions in the biliary tract[ 13 - 15 ]. However, in some cases, complex nonneoplastic liver lesions may interfere with the accurate interpretation of imaging results, which requires a review of the patient's detailed symptoms, signs, and the details of surgery history.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commonly used preoperative examinations of the liver include ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which provide important guidance for surgical preparation. In particular, contrast-enhanced CT and MRI can clearly show the vascular structure in the liver, including biliary strictures, biliary dilatation, and abnormal space-occupying lesions in the biliary tract[ 13 - 15 ]. However, in some cases, complex nonneoplastic liver lesions may interfere with the accurate interpretation of imaging results, which requires a review of the patient's detailed symptoms, signs, and the details of surgery history.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the scoring systems used to predict and measureseverity are complex, cumber-some and inaccurate [3]. Some of them are: a) the Acute Physiology, Age and Chronic Health Evaluation (Apache II) [4,7,9,14]; b) Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) [4,9]; c) the Ranson score [4,7,9]; d) Bedside index for severity in AP (BISAP) (blood urea nitrogen >25mg/dl, impaired mental status, Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, age >60 years and pleural effusions) [2,3,15]; e) The Harmless Acute Pancreatitis Score (HAPS) (no rebound tenderness and/ or guarding, normal hematocrit and normal serum creatinine level) allows rapid identification of patients who present mild AP in 98% of cases; f) CT severity index (CTSI) based on local complications and percentage of pancreatic necrosis seen on a CT scan [2,4,5,17,18]. Various laboratory tests and biomarkers for predicting AP outcome have been described: a) elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) [1,4,13,14,19,20]; b) elevated hematocrit (Ht) [5,7,14,21,22]; and c) high serum creatinine, as a doubtful predictor of pancreatic necrosis [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El uso de distintos métodos de imagen permite evaluar la presencia de cálculos en la vía biliar, con sensibilidad y especificidad variable. El estudio de elección en primera instancia es la ecografía abdominal que tiene una sensibilidad en torno al 60%, dada principalmente por limitaciones relacionadas a la experiencia del operador y la dificultad de evaluar el colédoco intrapancreático (4) . Actualmente la colangiografía por resonancia magnética (CRM) es el examen no invasivo de elección, con sensibilidad global entre 81 a 100%, cercana al 100% en cálculos mayores a 5 mm (4) .…”
unclassified