2019
DOI: 10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.421952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilimsel-Dayanaklı Uygulamaları Belirlemede “Tek-Denekli Deneysel Araştırmaların Niteliksel Göstergeleri” Yönergesi’nin Matematik Becerileri Öğretimi Örneğinde Ele Alınışı

Abstract: Özel eğitim alanında bilimsel-dayanaklı uygulamalar her geçen gün uzmanlar, araştırmacılar ve uygulamacılar arasında daha fazla dikkate alınan bir konu haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışmada, Horner ve diğerleri tarafından 2005 yılında önerilen bilimsel-dayanaklı uygulamaları belirlemede "Tek-Denekli Deneysel Araştırmaların Niteliksel Göstergeleri" yönergesi ele alınmıştır. Tek-denekli deneysel araştırma desenlerine göre tasarlanmış bilimsel çalışmaların değerlendirilmesinde bu yönergenin; (a) nasıl ele alınarak yorum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Büyüköztürk et al ( 2011 ) state that school administrations generally do not allow random assignments in studies where new methods are tested. Experimental designs -for which random assignment cannot be made- are expressed as weak experimental designs (Büyüköztürk et al, 2011 ; Aydın et al, 2019 ). Within the scope of this study, considering the teacher who will conduct the relevant course is a classroom teacher, the students' characteristics, the attitude of the school administration against random sampling and the purpose of the study, a single group pre-test-post-test pattern was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Büyüköztürk et al ( 2011 ) state that school administrations generally do not allow random assignments in studies where new methods are tested. Experimental designs -for which random assignment cannot be made- are expressed as weak experimental designs (Büyüköztürk et al, 2011 ; Aydın et al, 2019 ). Within the scope of this study, considering the teacher who will conduct the relevant course is a classroom teacher, the students' characteristics, the attitude of the school administration against random sampling and the purpose of the study, a single group pre-test-post-test pattern was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main factors that determines the difference between fully experimental and quasi-experimental research is whether the participants are selected by unbiased assignment. Since the participants of single-subject experimental studies are selected from among those who already have problematic behaviors or need to gain new behaviors, research participants cannot be determined by impartial assignment (Aydın, Tekin-İftar, & Rakap, 2019). In our study, students with reading difficulties were determined and those who met the prerequisites were included in the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple probe models aim to evaluate the effectiveness of a teaching or behavior change program in more than one situation (Aydın, Tekin-İftar, & Rakap, 2019). Multiple probe models; are examined in three groups as (a) inter-behavioral multiple probe model, (b) inter-participant multiple probe model, (c) inter-environment multiple probe model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%