2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2010.03.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilinear oscillatory integrals and boundedness for new bilinear multipliers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors would like to acknowledge the recent work of Bernicot and Germain [2] on bilinear oscillatory integrals which seems to mildly overlap with our present work.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The authors would like to acknowledge the recent work of Bernicot and Germain [2] on bilinear oscillatory integrals which seems to mildly overlap with our present work.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…To obtain the required estimate for the L p quasi-norm of the operator ∞ j=1 T σ j ( f 1 , f 2 ), due to the rapid convergence of the sums in 1,2,3,4 , it suffices to obtain the same estimate the L p quasi-norm of the expression ∞ j=1 2 jmc j,N 1 , 2 ,k 1 ,…”
Section: Proof Of Proposition 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fact that for every fixed T > 0 and C * > 0 the sequence exp(j 2 C * T /2)/(Cj 2 ) diverges as j → ∞, shows that there exits some sufficiently large j * such that (4.36) holds, thereby concluding the proof of the theorem. is locally Lipschitz (X, Y ) well-posed, if there exist continuous functions T, K : [0, ∞) 2 → (0, ∞), the time of existence and the Lipschitz constant, so that for every pair of initial data Θ (1) (0, ·), Θ (2) (0, ·) ∈ Y there exist unique solutions Θ (1) , Θ (2) ∈ L ∞ (0, T ; X) of the initial value problem associated to (4.37)-(4.38), that additionally satisfy…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 4.5. Clearly the time of existence T and the Lipschitz constant K also depend on S L ∞ (0,∞;Y ) , and on κ, but we have omitted this dependence in Definition 4.4 since it is the same for both solutions Θ (1) and Θ (2) . For the purpose of our ill-posedness result, we shall let Θ (2) (t, x) be the steady state Θ(x 3 ) introduced earlier in (4.4).…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%