2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilingual effects on lexical selection: A neurodevelopmental perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A neuroimaging study using the lexical selection paradigm also showed that bilinguals engaged frontal regions and the caudate and putamen, when presented with between-language competition ( Marian et al, 2017 ). However, our result of recruiting a lot of left PFC resources in the language switching condition is inconsistent with the recent fNIRS evidence that bilingual school-aged children (7–10 years old) showed greater activation in posterior temporo-parietal regions compared with monolingual children in a lexical selection task ( Arredondo et al, 2019a ). One important reason may be that our participants are 5- to 7-year-old EFL children who have insufficient bilingual experience in the English immersion program.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A neuroimaging study using the lexical selection paradigm also showed that bilinguals engaged frontal regions and the caudate and putamen, when presented with between-language competition ( Marian et al, 2017 ). However, our result of recruiting a lot of left PFC resources in the language switching condition is inconsistent with the recent fNIRS evidence that bilingual school-aged children (7–10 years old) showed greater activation in posterior temporo-parietal regions compared with monolingual children in a lexical selection task ( Arredondo et al, 2019a ). One important reason may be that our participants are 5- to 7-year-old EFL children who have insufficient bilingual experience in the English immersion program.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…While Moriguchi and Lertladaluck (2019) failed to find an association between L2 immersion time and brain function for cognitive shifting among 3-to 5-year-old bilinguals, suggesting insufficient L2 exposure may fail to influence neurocognitive plasticity, on the other hand, long-term early life bilingual exposure would influence children's cortical organization for language processing. For instance, by mid-childhood, bilingual children show greater activation in posterior temporo-parietal regions that support more automated lexical recognition, while monolinguals rely on greater activity in the left frontal regions (Arredondo et al, 2019a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the absence of differences in task performance, bilinguals engage brain regions associated with language areas when performing a non-linguistic higher cognitive function task, suggesting that demands from a dual-language environment may alter how cognitive systems develop and functionally organize (Arredondo et al, 2017(Arredondo et al, , 2019DeLuca et al, 2020;Garbin et al, 2010;Marian et al, 2014;Mohades et al, 2014;Pierce et al, 2015). The developmental nature of bilingual brain differences, including whether they are evident during early life, remains largely unstudied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data channels covered areas typically engaged in attention processing (frontal, parietal and temporal regions; Figure 1 ) [ 3 , 15 ]. Data analyses [ 16 ] were conducted using NIRS Brain AnalyzIR Toolbox [ 17 ], with custom scripts written in MATLAB (MathWorks, MA, USA). Optical density data was converted into HbR/HbO signal for individual data analyses.…”
Section: Experiments 1: Hbo Response During Temporal Flanker Task In Healthy Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%