2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bimanual microphacoemulsification and Acri.Smart intraocular lens implantation combined with vitreoretinal surgery

Abstract: Bimanual microphacoemulsification combined with vitrectomy was effective and safe. The microincisions and 19-gauge instruments provided excellent chamber resistance that simplified surgical maneuvers in eyes that might have a distorted fundus reflection and increased zonular laxity. The Acri. Smart 46 S IOL, which can be injected through a 2.0 mm incision, provided good fundus visibility during vitrectomy and good maneuverability up to the extreme periphery without resulting in glare or distracting reflections… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It enables better and faster visual recovery in comparison with isolated vitrectomy [14] and saves a second procedure, which is, furthermore, more complicated in the case of vitrectomised eyes [15,16,17,18]. In contrast to other authors [19], we excluded cases with retinal detachment from any cause since the postoperative incidence of complications is greater, with the formation of proliferative vitreoretinopathy or synechiae in the anterior segment [18,20] (as in 1 of the cases presented in our series) and difficulty in calculating the power of the IOL when there is an associated scleral procedure [21], and IOL stability. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It enables better and faster visual recovery in comparison with isolated vitrectomy [14] and saves a second procedure, which is, furthermore, more complicated in the case of vitrectomised eyes [15,16,17,18]. In contrast to other authors [19], we excluded cases with retinal detachment from any cause since the postoperative incidence of complications is greater, with the formation of proliferative vitreoretinopathy or synechiae in the anterior segment [18,20] (as in 1 of the cases presented in our series) and difficulty in calculating the power of the IOL when there is an associated scleral procedure [21], and IOL stability. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other manoeuvres which improve intraoperative visualisation of the macula in addition to the extraction of a significant cataract are: suturing the corneal incision instead of stromal hydration, which also favours maintenance of the anterior chamber during insertion of the microcannulas, and performing a posterior capsulotomy during pars plana vitrectomy prior to ERM and/or internal limiting membrane peeling. In this way, postoperative opacification of the posterior capsule is prevented [22,23,24,25,26], achieving more durable visual recovery [19] and assuring a good visualisation of the fundus to monitor retinal pathologies [25,26]. Nd:YAG capsulotomy in previously vitrectomised patients is not free from complications [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cataract surgery, with its microincision variants (coaxial microincision cataract surgery, bimanual microincision cataract surgery), is the most performed intraocular surgical procedure worldwide (16). Nowadays, owing to continuous technological innovation, cataract surgery has become more efficient and safe, offering excellent outcomes for patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] These IOLs are square-edged acrylic hydrophilic and demonstrate good capsular and excellent uveal biocompatibility, 5,6 with a low rate of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after cataract extraction, similar to that of other acrylic IOLs. 7 Cases of late postoperative PCO have been reported after implantation of older types of acrylic hydrophilic IOLs, such as the MemoryLens (CibaVision) and the Hydroview (Bausch & Lomb Surgical), but the high incidence of PCO with these IOLs was related to a special polishing technique used in the manufacture of the IOLs 8 or to the presence of silicone compounds in the IOLs' package gasket, not to the IOL material (Dough Friesen, Bausch & Lomb Surgical, letter to Therapeutic Products Directorate, June 19, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%