Organometallic
gold complexes are used in a range of catalytic
reactions, and they often serve as catalyst precursors that mediate
C–C bond formation. In this study, we investigate C–C
coupling to form ethane from various phosphine-ligated gem-digold(I)
methyl complexes including [Au
2
(μ-CH
3
)(PMe
2
Ar′)
2
][NTf
2
], [Au
2
(μ-CH
3
)(XPhos)
2
][NTf
2
], and [Au
2
(μ-CH
3
)(
t
BuXPhos)
2
][NTf
2
] {Ar′
= C
6
H
3
-2,6-(C
6
H
3
-2,6-Me)
2
, C
6
H
3
-2,6-(C
6
H
2
-2,4,6-Me)
2
, C
6
H
3
-2,6-(C
6
H
3
-2,6-
i
Pr)
2
, or
C
6
H
3
-2,6-(C
6
H
2
-2,4,6-
i
Pr)
2
; XPhos = 2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropylbiphenyl;
t
BuXPhos = 2-di-
tert
-butylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropylbiphenyl;
NTf
2
= bis(trifluoromethyl sulfonylimide)}. The gem-digold
methyl complexes are synthesized through reaction between Au(CH
3
)L and Au(L)(NTf
2
) {L = phosphines listed above}.
For [Au
2
(μ-CH
3
)(XPhos)
2
][NTf
2
] and [Au
2
(μ-CH
3
)(
t
BuXPhos)
2
][NTf
2
], solid-state
X-ray structures have been elucidated. The rate of ethane formation
from [Au
2
(μ-CH
3
)(PMe
2
Ar′)
2
][NTf
2
] increases as the steric bulk of the phosphine
substituent Ar′ decreases. Monitoring the rate of ethane elimination
reactions by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy provides evidence for a
second-order dependence on the gem-digold methyl complexes. Using
experimental and computational evidence, it is proposed that the mechanism
of C–C coupling likely involves (1) cleavage of [Au
2
(μ-CH
3
)(PMe
2
Ar′)
2
][NTf
2
] to form Au(PR
2
Ar′)(NTf
2
) and
Au(CH
3
)(PMe
2
Ar′), (2) phosphine migratio...