2017
DOI: 10.3765/amp.v4i0.3988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binarity and Focus in Prosodic Phrasing: New Evidence from Taiwan Mandarin

Abstract: This paper makes novel claims and presents new evidence for the binarity of prosodic phrases, alignment of focused elements, and their interaction. Several authors have argued that there are binarity restrictions at the level of the prosodic phrase (e.g. Prince 1980, Ito & Mester 1992, Selkirk 2000). In this paper, I provide new support for this claim from Taiwan Mandarin (TM). I argue that prosodic phrases must be decomposed into Minor Phrases (MIPs) and Major Phrases (MAPs) (Selkirk et al. 2004), and tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper reviews the stress distribution in Wegaia and offers a Python program capable of modeling local weight sensitivity in this extinct language. Future programming agenda may include a wider spectrum of quantity-sensitive phenomena in both theoretical and crosslinguistic perspectives, such as trochaic shortening in Fijian (Dixon 1988) and schwa reduction in Piuma Paiwan (Shih 2019), both of which are quantity-sensitive. How to model these phenomena in Python awaits further programming attempts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper reviews the stress distribution in Wegaia and offers a Python program capable of modeling local weight sensitivity in this extinct language. Future programming agenda may include a wider spectrum of quantity-sensitive phenomena in both theoretical and crosslinguistic perspectives, such as trochaic shortening in Fijian (Dixon 1988) and schwa reduction in Piuma Paiwan (Shih 2019), both of which are quantity-sensitive. How to model these phenomena in Python awaits further programming attempts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%