2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2020.590241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binary and Hybrid Work-Condition Maps for Interactive Exploration of Ergonomic Human Arm Postures

Abstract: Ergonomics of human workers is one of the key elements in design and evaluation of production processes. Human ergonomics have a major impact on productivity as well as chronic health risks incurred by inappropriate working postures and conditions. In this paper we propose a novel method for estimating and communicating the ergonomic work condition called Binary Work-Condition Map, which provides a visualized feedback about work conditions of different configurations of an arm. The map is of binary nature and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the interactive process of a PHRC task can be emulated by PREDICTOR in a risk-controlled manner, detailed biomechanical (and cognitive) assessment during the process can be assessed by using different sensors. For instance, by attaching motion markers and EMG sensors to the human body doing the emulated tasks, the measured marker positions and muscle activity levels together with the measured force applied by the human hands can be used as inputs for a human musculoskeletal model to estimate biomechanical quantities of the operator during the emulations, e.g., joint trajectories (Fang et al, 2018 ), Cartesian and joint stiffnesses (Fang et al, 2017 ; Ajoudani et al, 2018a ), joint torques (Peternel et al, 2021 ) and muscle forces (Peternel et al, 2019 ). These estimates can be further used to evaluate the safety and ergonomics of the emulated PHRC task.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the interactive process of a PHRC task can be emulated by PREDICTOR in a risk-controlled manner, detailed biomechanical (and cognitive) assessment during the process can be assessed by using different sensors. For instance, by attaching motion markers and EMG sensors to the human body doing the emulated tasks, the measured marker positions and muscle activity levels together with the measured force applied by the human hands can be used as inputs for a human musculoskeletal model to estimate biomechanical quantities of the operator during the emulations, e.g., joint trajectories (Fang et al, 2018 ), Cartesian and joint stiffnesses (Fang et al, 2017 ; Ajoudani et al, 2018a ), joint torques (Peternel et al, 2021 ) and muscle forces (Peternel et al, 2019 ). These estimates can be further used to evaluate the safety and ergonomics of the emulated PHRC task.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, to adapt to these di erent aspects, the robot should be able to infer the human state, which o en requires complex sensory setups [15,16]. However, complex measurement systems are not always available or feasible for practical applications, thus some states can be modeled, such as the desired motion of the robot/payload [17][18][19][20], human actions [21] and preferences [22,23], human physical fatigue [11], cognitive stress [24], and suitability of shared workspace [25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Physical Human-robot Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ergonomic costs are more naturally expressed in terms of human joint torques [16,28], so we also consider a 4-DOF kinematic model of the human arm with three rotational DOF at the shoulder and one rotational joint for the elbow extension. is model has parameters of l 1 and l 2 , for the length of the upper and lower arm, and x sh ∈ R 3 for the spatial position of the human shoulder.…”
Section: Human Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A more direct way to minimise fatigue is to use fatigue models that operate based on integrated effort over time. These models can be distinguished by how they estimate the effort, e.g., using muscle activity [17], limb endpoint force [18], or joint torque [19]- [21] in humans, and motor temperature [22] in robots. Nevertheless, fatigue models have been more commonly employed in upper limbs or whole-body analysis and control of ergonomics in manufacturing processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%